Literature DB >> 16946989

Budget variance analysis of a departmentwide implementation of a PACS at a major academic medical center.

Arra Suresh Reddy1, Shaun Loh, Robert A Kane.   

Abstract

In this study, the costs and cost savings associated with departmentwide implementation of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) as compared to the projected budget at the time of inception were evaluated. An average of $214,460 was saved each year with a total savings of $1,072,300 from 1999 to 2003, which is significantly less than the $2,943,750 projected savings. This discrepancy can be attributed to four different factors: (1) overexpenditures, (2) insufficient cost savings, (3) unanticipated costs, and (4) project management issues. Although the implementation of PACS leads to cost savings, actual savings will be much lower than expected unless extraordinary care is taken when devising the budget.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16946989      PMCID: PMC3045174          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-006-0852-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  5 in total

1.  Determining costs of imaging services.

Authors:  M D Cohen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  PACS: radiology in the digital world.

Authors:  L F Rogers
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  The volume and cost of radiologic services in the United States in 1990.

Authors:  J H Sunshine; M R Mabry; S Bansal
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Ineffective use of radiology: the hidden cost.

Authors:  P N Cascade; E W Webster; E A Kazerooni
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Making filmless radiology work.

Authors:  E L Siegel; J N Diaconis; S Pomerantz; R Allman; B Briscoe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.056

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Monitoring the PACS implementation process in a large university hospital--discrepancies between radiologists and physicians.

Authors:  Philippe Duyck; Bram Pynoo; Pieter Devolder; Tony Voet; Luc Adang; Dries Ovaere; Jan Vercruysse
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Virtual organization of hospital medical imaging: a user satisfaction survey.

Authors:  Claude Sicotte; Guy Paré; Kobena Kra Bini; Marie-Pierre Moreault; Guy Laverdure
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Evaluating the implementation of picture archiving and communication systems in Newfoundland and Labrador--a cost benefit analysis.

Authors:  Don MacDonald; Doreen Neville
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  [PACS: acceptance by orthopedic surgeons].

Authors:  M Lenhart; A Haueis; H Schneider; E-M Jung; T Herold; S Feuerbach; V Schöffl; N Zorger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  PACS Implementation Challenges in a Public Healthcare Institution: A South African Vendor Perspective.

Authors:  Romain Abbas; Yashik Singh
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2019-10-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.