Literature DB >> 16946663

Are "structural abnormalities" on magnetic resonance imaging a contraindication to the successful conservative treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain?

Frank Kleinstück1, Jiri Dvorak, Anne F Mannion.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between structural abnormalities recorded on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and outcome after evidence-based conservative treatment in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In most guidelines for the management of LBP, MRI is not recommended unless the diagnostic triage suggests serious spinal pathology or nerve root involvement for which surgical treatment is foreseen. This is because many structural changes seen on MRI appear to be as common in asymptomatic individuals as in people with LBP and are, therefore, considered of little value in either explaining the cause of pain or deciding the subsequent course of management. However, to our knowledge, no studies have assessed whether the presence of such MRI abnormalities influences the outcome of the conservative treatment that patients with chronic nonspecific LBP typically receive.
METHODS: T2-weighted, 4-mm spin-echo MRI sequences of the lumbar spine were obtained from 53 patients with chronic nonspecific LBP before a 3-month program of exercise therapy. Disc degeneration, disc bulging, high intensity zones, and endplate/bone marrow changes were assessed for each lumbar segment. Back pain (average and worst) and disability (Roland Morris score) were assessed before and after therapy, and 12 months later, and the improvements were examined in relation to the presence or absence of baseline MRI "abnormalities."
RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent of patients had severe disc degeneration (grade 4 or 5), 74% had disc bulging, 60% had high intensity zones, and 62% had endplate/bone marrow changes in at least 1 lumbar segment. Only 11% patients had none of these changes at any level. The MRI abnormalities showed only minimal association with baseline symptoms. In multivariate regression analyses, in which age, gender, and baseline symptoms were controlled for, only 1 significant association between the MRI variables and outcome was observed: the presence of a high intensity zone in any vertebral segment was associated with lower average pain at the 12-month follow-up (standardized beta -0.376, P = 0.006, 16.5% variance accounted for).
CONCLUSION: In the patient group examined, the presence of common "structural abnormalities" on MRI had no significant negative influence on the outcome after therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16946663     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000232802.95773.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  31 in total

Review 1.  Pathobiology of Modic changes.

Authors:  Stefan Dudli; Aaron J Fields; Dino Samartzis; Jaro Karppinen; Jeffrey C Lotz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Vertebral endplate signal changes (Modic change): a systematic literature review of prevalence and association with non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Tue Secher Jensen; Jaro Karppinen; Joan S Sorensen; Jaakko Niinimäki; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Modic changes: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Yue-Hui Zhang; Chang-Qing Zhao; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Xiao-Dong Chen; Li-Yang Dai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The assessment of function. Part II: clinical perspective of a javelin thrower with low back and groin pain.

Authors:  Michael P Reiman; Robert C Manske
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-05

5.  Infection and low back pain: seeking evidence or fear of exploring new indications for antibiotics?

Authors:  Majid Artus; Jeremy Fairbank; Matthew Scarborough; Nadine Foster
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The location of Modic changes in the lumbar spine: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhe-Yu Huang; Hai-Chao Xu; Tao Lei; Qing-Long Li; Ai-Min Wu; Wen-Fei Ni
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Potential triaging of referrals for lumbar spinal surgery consultation: a comparison of referral accuracy from pain specialists, findings from advanced imaging and a 3-item questionnaire.

Authors:  David Simon; Matt Coyle; Simon Dagenais; Joseph O'Neil; Eugene K Wai
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 8.  Clinical diagnosis for discogenic low back pain.

Authors:  Yin-gang Zhang; Tuan-mao Guo; Xiong Guo; Shi-xun Wu
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 6.580

9.  Acute Low Back Pain: Differential Somatosensory Function and Gene Expression Compared With Healthy No-Pain Controls.

Authors:  Angela R Starkweather; Divya Ramesh; Debra E Lyon; Umaporn Siangphoe; Xioayan Deng; Jamie Sturgill; Amy Heineman; R K Elswick; Susan G Dorsey; Joel Greenspan
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.442

10.  Characteristics and natural course of vertebral endplate signal (Modic) changes in the Danish general population.

Authors:  Tue S Jensen; Tom Bendix; Joan S Sorensen; Claus Manniche; Lars Korsholm; Per Kjaer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.