OBJECTIVE: The administration of antibiotic prophylaxis to laboring women who harbor Group B streptococci (GBS) depends on identification of carriers. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of GBS using a more stringent culture method. METHODS: Two swabs were used simultaneously to obtain rectovaginal GBS samples from consenting women. One swab was analyzed using a stringent, validated culture technology, which included direct plating onto selective agar and inoculation of a selective broth. The other swab was used for a commercial real-time PCR assay, which uses amplification to detect the presence of the cfb gene sequence of GBS DNA. We calculated the assay accuracy using sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: A total of 233 samples were available. Both the culture and PCR methods were positive for 59 and negative for 157 patients. The culture method was positive and PCR was negative in 9 patients. The culture was negative and the PCR positive for 8 patients. The sensitivity of the PCR assay was 86.8% and specificity was 95.2%. The positive predictive value was 88.1% and the negative predictive value was 94.6%. CONCLUSION: Although a rapid PCR assay may be useful to determine GBS status in the urgent intrapartum setting, the false-negative rate of 13.2% for the real-time PCR assay prohibits its use for standard GBS screening in the office.
OBJECTIVE: The administration of antibiotic prophylaxis to laboring women who harbor Group B streptococci (GBS) depends on identification of carriers. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of GBS using a more stringent culture method. METHODS: Two swabs were used simultaneously to obtain rectovaginal GBS samples from consenting women. One swab was analyzed using a stringent, validated culture technology, which included direct plating onto selective agar and inoculation of a selective broth. The other swab was used for a commercial real-time PCR assay, which uses amplification to detect the presence of the cfb gene sequence of GBS DNA. We calculated the assay accuracy using sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: A total of 233 samples were available. Both the culture and PCR methods were positive for 59 and negative for 157 patients. The culture method was positive and PCR was negative in 9 patients. The culture was negative and the PCR positive for 8 patients. The sensitivity of the PCR assay was 86.8% and specificity was 95.2%. The positive predictive value was 88.1% and the negative predictive value was 94.6%. CONCLUSION: Although a rapid PCR assay may be useful to determine GBS status in the urgent intrapartum setting, the false-negative rate of 13.2% for the real-time PCR assay prohibits its use for standard GBS screening in the office.
Authors: Feng-Ying C Lin; Leonard E Weisman; Parvin Azimi; Amy E Young; Kathleen Chang; Mikhaela Cielo; Patricia Moyer; James F Troendle; Rachel Schneerson; John B Robbins Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Cilicia S do Nascimento; Nayara F B Dos Santos; Rita C C Ferreira; Carla R Taddei Journal: Braz J Microbiol Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 2.476
Authors: Hasyanee Binmaeil; Alfizah Hanafiah; Isa Mohamed Rose; Raja Affendi Raja Ali Journal: Infect Drug Resist Date: 2021-10-06 Impact factor: 4.003