Literature DB >> 16945653

What is the need for additional bladder surgery after bladder augmentation in childhood?

P D Metcalfe1, M P Cain, M Kaefer, D A Gilley, K K Meldrum, R Misseri, S J King, A J Casale, R C Rink.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bladder augmentation has revolutionized the care of children with a neuropathic bladder but it remains a major surgical procedure. However, the need for subsequent bladder surgery has not been well defined in a large series with long-term followup.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of the first 500 bladder augmentations performed from 1978 to 2003 at our institution. Charts were reviewed for complications requiring additional surgery, including malignancy, bladder perforation, repeat augmentation, bowel obstruction and bladder calculi. Mean and median followup was 13.3 years.
RESULTS: Complications occurred in 169 patients (34%) resulting in a total of 254 surgeries. The cumulative risk of further surgery at the bladder level was 0.04 operations per patient per year of augmentation. Three patients (0.6%) had transitional cell carcinoma, of whom all presented with metastatic disease and died. Bladder perforation occurred in 43 patients (8.6%) with a total of 53 events. Of the patients 16 (3.2%) required laparotomy for bowel obstruction and 47 (9.4%) required repeat augmentation. Bladder stones were treated in 75 patients (15%), who required a total of 125 surgeries.
CONCLUSIONS: Bladder augmentation provides immeasurable improvements in quality of life but it requires lifelong dedication from the patient, family and health care providers. While the requirements for additional surgery are not trivial, 66% of our patients have not required any further surgery in the augmented bladder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16945653     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  19 in total

Review 1.  Neuropathic bladders: Investigation and treatment through their lifetime.

Authors:  Peter D Metcalfe
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Current approaches to the urologic care of children with spina bifida.

Authors:  David B Joseph
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Cumulative incidence of outcomes and urologic procedures after augmentation cystoplasty.

Authors:  Bruce J Schlomer; Hillary L Copp
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 4.  Highlights of the university of toronto urology update 2014.

Authors:  Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  An unusual cause of abdominal distension: intraperitoneal bladder perforation secondary to intermittent self-catheterisation.

Authors:  Jennifer Martin; Liam Convie; David Mark; Mark McClure
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-02-25

Review 6.  Augmented bladders and urinary diversions.

Authors:  Peter Metcalfe; Shuba De; Greg Bailly
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  The basics of transition in congenital lifelong urology.

Authors:  Matthieu Peycelon; Rosalia Misseri
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Surgical management of pediatric urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Joao Luiz Pippi Salle
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Urinary tract stone development in patients with myelodysplasia subjected to augmentation cystoplasty.

Authors:  Courtney L Shepard; Guaqiao Wang; Betsy D Hopson; Erika B Bunt; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

10.  Pediatric enterocystoplasty: long-term complications and controversies.

Authors:  Eric A Kurzrock
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.