Literature DB >> 16945637

Long-term followup of visual internal urethrotomy for management of short (less than 1 cm) penile urethral strictures following hypospadias repair.

D A Husmann1, S R Rathbun.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We reviewed the results of direct vision urethrotomy for short (less than 1 cm) penile urethral strictures following hypospadias surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with less than 1 cm anterior penile urethral strictures located proximal to the meatus underwent direct vision urethrotomy. Based on the type of initial urethroplasty patients were randomly divided into treatment with direct vision urethrotomy vs direct vision urethrotomy plus clean intermittent catheterization for 3 months. Success was defined as absent obstructive voiding symptoms and a normal urine flow 2 years following the last patient instrumentation.
RESULTS: Of patients with urethral strictures following hypospadias repair 44% (32) had previously undergone tubularized graft urethroplasty and 56% (40) had previously undergone flap urethroplasty, including a tubularized island flap in 18, an onlay flap in 11 and urethral plate urethroplasty in 11. Direct vision urethrotomy alone was performed in 51% of patients (37), and direct vision urethrotomy and clean intermittent catheterization were performed in 49% (35). Success with the 2 methods was similar, that is 24% (9 of 37 patients) vs 22% (8 of 35). Following direct vision urethrotomy all patients with tubularized graft urethroplasty showed failure (0 of 32). Success was noted in 11% of patients (2 of 18) with tubularized island flap urethroplasty compared to 72% (8 of 11) with onlay urethroplasty and 63% (7 of 11) with urethral plate urethroplasty (each p <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of clean intermittent catheterization to direct vision urethrotomy does not improve the likelihood of success. Direct vision urethrotomy for short (less than 1 cm) urethral stricture usually fails following any type of tubularized graft or flap urethroplasty but it had moderate success following onlay flap and urethral plate urethroplasties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16945637     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00617-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

1.  [Surgical trends in secondary hypospadias].

Authors:  M Musch; M Mosters; V Klevecka; D Kröpfl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Urethral reconstruction in patients with failed hypospadia repair].

Authors:  D Kröpfl; I Kunz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Failed hypospadias in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Santiago Vallasciani; Gianantonio Manzoni; Waifro Rigamonti; Enrico De Grazia; Marco Castagnetti
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Salvage hypospadias repairs.

Authors:  V Sripathi; M Satheesh; K Shubha
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.