Literature DB >> 16945449

Impact of a generic substitution reform on patients' and society's expenditure for pharmaceuticals.

Karolina Andersson1, Gina Bergström, Max G Petzold, Anders Carlsten.   

Abstract

Sweden's pharmaceutical expenditure has increased during the last decades. On 1 October 2002 mandatory generic substitution was introduced in Sweden with the purpose to reduce the growth in pharmaceutical expenditure. The aim of the present study was to investigate if the implementation of generic substitution was associated with changes in patients' expenses and reimbursed cost for prescribed pharmaceuticals included in the Swedish Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Monthly pharmacy sales data was obtained from the National Corporation of Swedish Pharmacies (Apoteket AB). The study period ranged between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2004. Changes in pharmaceutical expenditure associated with the introduction of generic substitution were analysed with a linear segmented regression. The study comprised outpatient prescription pharmaceuticals encompassed by PBS for Sweden in total and each county council. Two different data sets were analysed. The first comprised all prescribed pharmaceuticals. The second contained only pharmaceuticals on regular prescriptions (i.e. exclusion of multidose dispensed drugs). Changes in patient co-payment per 1000 inhabitants and working day and subsidised cost per 1000 inhabitants and working day associated with the introduction of generic substitution were analysed. Expenditure was expressed in Swedish krona, SEK (SEK 1=US$ 0.14/euro 0.11, 7 July 2006). The Swedish Consumer Price Index was used to inflation-adjust expenditures with 2004 as base. The introduction of generic substitution was associated with a significant change in slope for patient co-payment in both all prescribed pharmaceuticals and pharmaceuticals on regular prescriptions (p<0.005) for Sweden in total. The slope shifted direction from a slight increase before the reform into a decline after the reform was implemented. This was also found for the average slope of patient co-payment for all county councils (p<0.0001). The introduction of generic substitution was associated with a statistically significant shift in slope for subsidised cost for Sweden in total (p<0.001). The slope shifted from a monthly increase before October 2002 to a monthly decline for all prescribed pharmaceuticals afterwards. Similar results were found for the average slope of subsidised cost for all county councils both for all prescribed pharmaceuticals and pharmaceuticals on regular prescriptions (p<0.0001). The introduction of generic substitution was associated with a shift in trend from an increase into a decrease both for patients' and society's expenditures. This suggests that generic substitution has contributed to a reduction in the growth of pharmaceutical expenditure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16945449     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  24 in total

1.  Is there a need for a formulary of clinically interchangeable medicines to guide generic substitution in Saudi Arabia?

Authors:  Alian A Alrasheedy; Mohamed Azmi Hassali; Hisham Aljadhey; Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim; Saleh Karamah Al-Tamimi
Journal:  J Young Pharm       Date:  2013-07-08

2.  Generic substitution, financial interests, and imperfect agency.

Authors:  Maurus Rischatsch; Maria Trottmann; Peter Zweifel
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2013-03-14

3.  Perceptions and behaviors of patients and pharmacists towards generic drug substitution in Lebanon.

Authors:  Shadi Saleh; Clara Abou Samra; Stewart Jleilaty; Joanne Constantin; Nour El Arnaout; Hani Dimassi; Dania Al-Bittar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-08-19

4.  Amiodarone-induced thyroid dysfunction: brand-name versus generic formulations.

Authors:  Meytal A Tsadok; Cynthia A Jackevicius; Elham Rahme; Vidal Essebag; Mark J Eisenberg; Karin H Humphries; Jack V Tu; Hassan Behlouli; Jennifer Joo; Louise Pilote
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  State generic substitution laws can lower drug outlays under Medicaid.

Authors:  William H Shrank; Niteesh K Choudhry; Jessica Agnew-Blais; Alex D Federman; Joshua N Liberman; Jun Liu; Aaron S Kesselheim; M Alan Brookhart; Michael A Fischer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Forecasting drug utilization and expenditure in a metropolitan health region.

Authors:  Björn Wettermark; Marie E Persson; Nils Wilking; Mats Kalin; Seher Korkmaz; Paul Hjemdahl; Brian Godman; Max Petzold; Lars L Gustafsson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  The impact of generic substitution on the activities of pharmaceutical companies - a survey from the companies' perspective one year and five years after the introduction of generic substitution in finland.

Authors:  Johanna Timonen; Marina Bengtström; Pekka Karttunen; Riitta Ahonen
Journal:  BMC Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10-22

8.  Is there a relationship between patient beliefs or communication about generic drugs and medication utilization?

Authors:  William H Shrank; Suzanne M Cadarette; Emily Cox; Michael A Fischer; Jyotsna Mehta; Alan M Brookhart; Jerry Avorn; Niteesh K Choudhry
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Exploring knowledge and perceptions of generic medicines among drug retailers and community pharmacists.

Authors:  S C Basak; D Sathyanarayana
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 0.975

10.  Simulation of the AUC changes after generic substitution in patients.

Authors:  Dong-Seok Yim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.