PURPOSE: To compare late rectal toxicity rates after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to the prostate alone (P-3D-CRT) and whole-pelvis intensity-modulated radiotherapy along with a prostate boost (WP-IMRT/PB) to the same nominal total dose to the prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 68 patients treated with conformal radiotherapy to the prostate only to 76 Gy at the National Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, Italy, represented the first group (P-3D-CRT). The second group consisted of 45 patients treated at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, TX, USA, with IMRT covering the pelvic nodes and seminal vesicles to 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction and the prostate to 60 Gy in the same 30 fractions. A separate phase boosted the prostate to 76 Gy (WP-IMRT/PB). Major aspects of planning were remarkably similar at both institutions leaving the inclusion or not of pelvic nodes as the main treatment-related difference between the two groups. Late rectal toxicity was prospectively scored according to the RTOG scale. All patients have a 12-month minimum follow-up, and mean follow-up, similar in both groups, is 25.9 months (SD [standard deviation]: 8.4 months). RESULTS: At 2 years, the estimated cumulative incidence of grade 2 late rectal toxicity is 6%+/-4% for WP-IMRT/PB and 21.2%+/-6% for P-3D-CRT (p=0.06). The difference became significant (HR [hazard ratio]=0.1, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.0-0.6; p=0.01) at multivariate analysis. None of the patients developed grade 3+ toxicity. CONCLUSION: Despite the larger treated volume, WP-IMRT/PB allows more rectal sparing than P-3D-CRT.
PURPOSE: To compare late rectal toxicity rates after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to the prostate alone (P-3D-CRT) and whole-pelvis intensity-modulated radiotherapy along with a prostate boost (WP-IMRT/PB) to the same nominal total dose to the prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 68 patients treated with conformal radiotherapy to the prostate only to 76 Gy at the National Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, Italy, represented the first group (P-3D-CRT). The second group consisted of 45 patients treated at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, TX, USA, with IMRT covering the pelvic nodes and seminal vesicles to 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction and the prostate to 60 Gy in the same 30 fractions. A separate phase boosted the prostate to 76 Gy (WP-IMRT/PB). Major aspects of planning were remarkably similar at both institutions leaving the inclusion or not of pelvic nodes as the main treatment-related difference between the two groups. Late rectal toxicity was prospectively scored according to the RTOG scale. All patients have a 12-month minimum follow-up, and mean follow-up, similar in both groups, is 25.9 months (SD [standard deviation]: 8.4 months). RESULTS: At 2 years, the estimated cumulative incidence of grade 2 late rectal toxicity is 6%+/-4% for WP-IMRT/PB and 21.2%+/-6% for P-3D-CRT (p=0.06). The difference became significant (HR [hazard ratio]=0.1, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.0-0.6; p=0.01) at multivariate analysis. None of the patients developed grade 3+ toxicity. CONCLUSION: Despite the larger treated volume, WP-IMRT/PB allows more rectal sparing than P-3D-CRT.
Authors: Jeff M Michalski; Yan Yan; Deborah Watkins-Bruner; Walter R Bosch; Kathryn Winter; James M Galvin; Jean-Paul Bahary; Gerard C Morton; Matthew B Parliament; Howard M Sandler Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-10-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Martin Dolezel; Karel Odrazka; Miloslava Vaculikova; Jaroslav Vanasek; Jana Sefrova; Petr Paluska; Milan Zouhar; Jan Jansa; Zuzana Macingova; Lida Jarosova; Milos Brodak; Petr Moravek; Igor Hartmann Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: C Franzese; A Fogliata; G R D'Agostino; L Di Brina; T Comito; P Navarria; L Cozzi; M Scorsetti Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2017-03-08 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Nicholas Hardcastle; Wolfgang A Tomé; Kerwyn Foo; Andrew Miller; Martin Carolan; Peter Metcalfe Journal: Med Dosim Date: 2010-08-30 Impact factor: 1.482
Authors: Tereza Kertesz; Markus K A Herrmann; Antonia Zapf; Hans Christiansen; Robert M Hermann; Olivier Pradier; Heinz Schmidberger; Clemens F Hess; Andrea Hille Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2009-09-12 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Andrea Hille; Markus K A Herrmann; Tereza Kertesz; Hans Christiansen; Robert M Hermann; Olivier Pradier; Heinz Schmidberger; Clemens-F Hess Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 3.621