Literature DB >> 16944183

Surgery for slow transit constipation: are we helping patients?

M Zutshi1, T L Hull, R Trzcinski, A Arvelakis, M Xu.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Long-term outcome after surgery for slow transit constipation is conflicting. The aim of this study was to assess long-term quality of life after surgery.
METHODS: The medical records of all patients undergoing colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis between 1983 and 1998 were evaluated. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative details were recorded. A survey was conducted to evaluate current symptoms and health. Quality of life was assessed using the short-form (SF)-36 survey.
RESULTS: Sixty-nine (2 male) patients were identified. Five were deceased. Mean age at surgery was 38.6 years (range, 19.7-78.8 years). Median follow-up after surgery was 10.8 years (range, 5.1-18.6 years). Forty-one percent had a family history of constipation. Eleven (16%) had an ileus postoperatively, which responded to medical therapy. One patient had a leak that required temporary diversion. Long-term complications occurred in 32 (46%) patients, which included hernias (3 patients; 4%), pelvic abscess (1 patient; 1.5%), rectal pain (1 patient; 1.5%), small-bowel obstruction (14 patients; 20%, with eight requiring surgery), diarrhea (5 patients; 7%), incontinence (1 patient, 1.5%), and persistent constipation (6 patients; 9%). Fifty-five percent (35/64) responded to a questionnaire. Overall, 25 of 35 (77% of the respondents) stated that surgery was beneficial. Sixty-four percent of patients have semisolid stools, 35% have liquid stools, and 4% reported hard stool. Results of the SF-36 showed the physical component score was comparable with healthy individuals. However, the mental component score was low especially in the areas of vitality (median, 45) and social functioning (median, 37).
CONCLUSION: Surgery for constipation is not perfect, and preoperative symptoms may persist after surgery. When assessing long-term quality of life, the mental component of the SF-36 was low compared with the general population, and the physical component was similar. Moreover, because 77% report long-term improvement, surgery is beneficial for appropriate patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16944183     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-006-0189-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  24 in total

1.  Colectomy for slow-transit constipation: preoperative functional evaluation is important but not a guarantee for a successful outcome.

Authors:  R M Mollen; H C Kuijpers; A T Claassen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Physician visits in the United States for constipation: 1958 to 1986.

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; T R Koch
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Ileostomy for constipation: long-term postoperative outcome.

Authors:  M Scarpa; M Barollo; M R B Keighley
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for colonic inertia.

Authors:  Cliff Sample; Rohit Gupta; Fahad Bamehriz; Mehran Anvari
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Long-term results of the antegrade continent enema procedure for constipation in adults.

Authors:  N P Lees; P Hodson; J Hill; R C Pearson; I MacLennan
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Colectomy for severe slow-transit constipation in strictly selected patients.

Authors:  J Christiansen; O O Rasmussen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Outcome of colectomy for slow-transit constipation in relation to presence of small-bowel dysmotility.

Authors:  Abdulhakim Glia; Jan Erik Akerlund; Greger Lindberg
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Permanent sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of idiopathic constipation.

Authors:  N J Kenefick; R J Nicholls; R G Cohen; M A Kamm
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Long-term outcome after colectomy in severe idiopathic constipation.

Authors:  G Nylund; T Oresland; S Fasth; S Nordgren
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Outcome of colectomy for severe idiopathic constipation.

Authors:  M A Kamm; P R Hawley; J E Lennard-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Functional Disorders: Slow-Transit Constipation.

Authors:  John Tillou; Vitaliy Poylin
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-02

2.  Surgical outcomes after total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis in patients with medically intractable slow transit constipation.

Authors:  Guiyun Sohn; Chang Sik Yu; Chan Wook Kim; Jae Young Kwak; Tae Young Jang; Kyung Ho Kim; Song Soo Yang; Yong Sik Yoon; Seok-Byung Lim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2011-08-31

3.  Effect of different surgical options on curative effect, nutrition, and health status of patients with slow transit constipation.

Authors:  Fan Li; Tao Fu; Weidong Tong; Anping Zhang; Chunxue Li; Yu Gao; Jin Song Wu; Baohua Liu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Comparison of defecatory function after laparoscopic total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis versus a traditional open approach.

Authors:  Mas Khan; D Jayne; R Saunders
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Standard medical therapies do not alter colonic transit time in children with treatment-resistant slow-transit constipation.

Authors:  Melanie C C Clarke; Janet W Chase; Susie Gibb; Anthony G Catto-Smith; John M Hutson; Bridget R Southwell
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Colectomy for slow transit constipation: effective for patients with coexistent obstructed defecation.

Authors:  Avraham Reshef; Patricia Alves-Ferreira; Massarat Zutshi; Tracy Hull; Brooke Gurland
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Surgical management of colonic inertia.

Authors:  Jacob A McCoy; David E Beck
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-03

8.  Subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy for selected patients with slow transit constipation-from Chinese report.

Authors:  Cong-Qing Jiang; Qun Qian; Zhi-Su Liu; Gassimou Bangoura; Ke-Yan Zheng; Yun-Hua Wu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Favorable surgical treatment outcomes for chronic constipation with features of colonic pseudo-obstruction.

Authors:  Eon Chul Han; Heung-Kwon Oh; Heon-Kyun Ha; Eun Kyung Choe; Sang Hui Moon; Seung-Bum Ryoo; Kyu Joo Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Consensus statement AIGO/SICCR diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation and obstructed defecation (part II: treatment).

Authors:  Antonio Bove; Massimo Bellini; Edda Battaglia; Renato Bocchini; Dario Gambaccini; Vincenzo Bove; Filippo Pucciani; Donato Francesco Altomare; Giuseppe Dodi; Guido Sciaudone; Ezio Falletto; Vittorio Piloni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.