Literature DB >> 16943482

Uncompromised quality of the cement mantle in Exeter femoral components implanted through a minimally-invasive direct anterior approach. A prospective, randomised cadaver study.

E Mayr1, M Krismer, M Ertl, O Kessler, M Thaler, M Nogler.   

Abstract

A complete cement mantle is important for the longevity of a total hip replacement. In the minimally-invasive direct anterior approach used at the Innsbruck University hospital, the femoral component has to be inserted into the femoral canal by an angulated movement. In a cadaver study, the quality and the extent of the cement mantle surrounding 13 Exeter femoral components implanted straight through a standard anterolateral transgluteal approach were compared with those of 13 similar femoral components implanted in an angulated fashion through a direct anterior approach. A third-generation cementing technique was used. The inner and outer contours of the cement mantles was traced from CT scans and the thickness and cross-sectional area determined. In no case was the cement mantle incomplete. The total mean thickness of the cement mantle was 3.62 mm (95% confidence interval 3.59 to 3.65). The mean thickness in the group using the minimally-invasive approach was 0.16 mm less than that in the anterolateral group. The distribution of the thickness was similar in the two groups. The mean thickness was less on the anteromedial and anterolateral aspect than on the posterior aspect of the femur. There is no evidence that the angulated introduction of Exeter femoral components in the direct anterior approach in cadavers compromises the quality, extent or thickness of the cement mantle.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16943482     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B9.17538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  7 in total

1.  Quality of the femoral cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior hip approach.

Authors:  Eustathios Kenanidis; Rajiv Kaila; Lazaros Poultsides; Eleftherios Tsiridis; Panayiotis Christofilopoulos
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-06-22

2.  The posterior approach reduces the risk of thin cement mantles with a straight femoral stem design.

Authors:  Gavin J Macpherson; Christian Hank; Michael Schneider; Morag Trayner; Robert Elton; Colin R Howie; Steffen J Breusch
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  The bikini incision anterior cemented total hip arthroplasty: Assessment of radiological and clinical outcomes - A mid-term review.

Authors:  Ikram Nizam; Avinash Alva; Sophia Gogos
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2021-01-12

4.  Advances and innovations in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andreas Fontalis; Jean-Alain Epinette; Martin Thaler; Luigi Zagra; Vikas Khanduja; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2021-04-12

5.  The minimal invasive direct anterior approach in combination with large heads in total hip arthroplasty - is dislocation still a major issue? a case control study.

Authors:  Steffen Hoell; Marius Sander; Georg Gosheger; Helmut Ahrens; Ralf Dieckmann; Gregor Hauschild
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Total hip arthroplasty through an anterior approach: The pros and cons.

Authors:  Georgios Kyriakopoulos; Lazaros Poultsides; Panayiotis Christofilopoulos
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-11-01

Review 7.  Hemiarthroplasty of the hip using the direct anterior approach.

Authors:  Michael Nogler; Filippo Randelli; George A Macheras; Martin Thaler
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 1.154

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.