Literature DB >> 16943319

Nonlocomotor and locomotor hindlimb responses evoked by electrical microstimulation of the lumbar cord in spinalized cats.

Dorothy Barthélemy1, Hugues Leblond, Janyne Provencher, Serge Rossignol.   

Abstract

As a preliminary step to using intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) for rehabilitation purposes, the distribution of various types of hindlimb responses evoked by ISMS in spinal cats (T(13)) is described. The responses to ISMS applied through a single electrode was assessed, before and after an intravenous injection of clonidine (noradrenergic agonist), using kinematics and electromyographic recordings in subacute (5-7 days, untrained) or chronic (3-5 wk trained on a treadmill) spinal cats. ISMS was applied in the dorsal, intermediate and ventral areas of segments L(3)-L(7), from midline to 3 mm laterally. Uni- and bilateral non-locomotor responses as well as rhythmical locomotor responses were evoked. In the subacute cats, ipsilateral flexion was elicited in the dorsal region of L(3)-L(7), whereas ipsilateral extension was evoked more ventrally and mainly in the caudal segments. Dorsal stimuli could induce ipsilateral flexion followed by ipsilateral extension. Sites inducing bilateral flexion and bilateral extension were similarly distributed to those evoking ipsilateral flexion and extension in the rostrocaudal axis but were evoked from more medial sites. Ipsilateral flexion with crossed extension was evoked from intermediate and ventral zones of all segments and lateralities. Unilateral ipsilateral locomotion was rarely observed. Contralateral locomotion was more frequent and mainly evoked medially, whereas bilateral locomotion was evoked exclusively from dorsal regions. With some exceptions, those distribution gradients were similar in the four conditions (subacute, chronic, pre- and postclonidine), but the proportion of each response could vary. The distribution of ISMS-evoked responses is discussed as a function of known localization of interneurons and motoneurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16943319     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00203.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  21 in total

Review 1.  In search of lost presynaptic inhibition.

Authors:  Pablo Rudomin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modularity of endpoint force patterns evoked using intraspinal microstimulation in treadmill trained and/or neurotrophin-treated chronic spinal cats.

Authors:  Vanessa S Boyce; Michel A Lemay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Upper-limb muscle responses to epidural, subdural and intraspinal stimulation of the cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  Abigail N Sharpe; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Hindlimb movement in the cat induced by amplitude-modulated stimulation using extra-spinal electrodes.

Authors:  Changfeng Tai; Jicheng Wang; Bing Shen; Xianchun Wang; James R Roppolo; William C de Groat
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Volitional walking via upper limb muscle-controlled stimulation of the lumbar locomotor center in man.

Authors:  Syusaku Sasada; Kenji Kato; Suguru Kadowaki; Stefan J Groiss; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Tomoyoshi Komiyama; Yukio Nishimura
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Differential modulation of crossed and uncrossed reflex pathways by clonidine in adult cats following complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Alain Frigon; Michael D Johnson; C J Heckman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Peripheral inflammation undermines the plasticity of the isolated spinal cord.

Authors:  Michelle A Hook; John R Huie; James W Grau
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Hindlimb endpoint forces predict movement direction evoked by intraspinal microstimulation in cats.

Authors:  Michel A Lemay; Dane Grasse; Warren M Grill
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 9.  Spinal cord injury: present and future therapeutic devices and prostheses.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

10.  Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input.

Authors:  Grégoire Courtine; Yury Gerasimenko; Rubia van den Brand; Aileen Yew; Pavel Musienko; Hui Zhong; Bingbing Song; Yan Ao; Ronaldo M Ichiyama; Igor Lavrov; Roland R Roy; Michael V Sofroniew; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.