Literature DB >> 1694187

Organization of cortical, basal forebrain, and hypothalamic afferents to the parabrachial nucleus in the rat.

M M Moga1, H Herbert, K M Hurley, Y Yasui, T S Gray, C B Saper.   

Abstract

In a previous study (Herbert et al., J. Comp. Neurol. [1990];293:540-580), we demonstrated that the ascending afferent projections from the medulla to the parabrachial nucleus (PB) mark out functionally specific terminal domains within the PB. In this study, we examine the organization of the forebrain afferents to the PB. The PB was found to receive afferents from the infralimbic, the lateral prefrontal, and the insular cortical areas; the dorsomedial, the ventromedial, the median preoptic, and the paraventricular hypothalamic nuclei; the dorsal, the retrochiasmatic, and the lateral hypothalamic areas; the central nucleus of the amygdala; the substantia innominata; and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. In general, forebrain areas tend to innervate the same PB subnuclei from which they receive their input. Three major patterns of afferent termination were noted in the PB; these corresponded to the three primary sources of forebrain input to the PB: the cerebral cortex, the hypothalamus, and the basal forebrain. Hypothalamic afferents innervate predominantly rostral portions of the PB, particularly the central lateral and dorsal lateral subnuclei. The basal forebrain projection to the PB ends densely in the external lateral and waist subnuclei. Cortical afferents terminate most heavily in the caudal half of the PB, particularly in the ventral lateral and medial subnuclei. In addition, considerable topography organization was found within the individual projections. For example, tuberal lateral hypothalamic neurons project heavily to the central lateral subnucleus and lightly to the waist area; in contrast, caudal lateral hypothalamic neurons send a moderately heavy projection to both the central lateral and waist subnuclei. Our results show that the forebrain afferents of the PB are topographically organized. These topographical differences may provide a substrate for the diversity of visceral functions associated with the PB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1694187     DOI: 10.1002/cne.902950408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  79 in total

1.  Connections of the lateral hypothalamic area juxtadorsomedial region in the male rat.

Authors:  Joel D Hahn; Larry W Swanson
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Projections from bed nuclei of the stria terminalis, dorsomedial nucleus: implications for cerebral hemisphere integration of neuroendocrine, autonomic, and drinking responses.

Authors:  Hong-Wei Dong; Larry W Swanson
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Reassessment of the structural basis of the ascending arousal system.

Authors:  Patrick M Fuller; Patrick Fuller; David Sherman; Nigel P Pedersen; Clifford B Saper; Jun Lu
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 4.  Spatial organization of direct hippocampal field CA1 axonal projections to the rest of the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Lee A Cenquizca; Larry W Swanson
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-05-10

5.  Activating mu-opioid receptors in the lateral parabrachial nucleus increases c-Fos expression in forebrain areas associated with caloric regulation, reward and cognition.

Authors:  M Denbleyker; D M Nicklous; P J Wagner; H G Ward; K J Simansky
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Gustatory neural circuitry in the hamster brain stem.

Authors:  Young K Cho; Cheng-Shu Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Forebrain neurons that project to the gustatory parabrachial nucleus in rat lack glutamic acid decarboxylase.

Authors:  Shalini Saggu; Robert F Lundy
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Activating parabrachial cannabinoid CB1 receptors selectively stimulates feeding of palatable foods in rats.

Authors:  Nicholas V DiPatrizio; Kenny J Simansky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Sex specific recruitment of a medial prefrontal cortex-hippocampal-thalamic system during context-dependent renewal of responding to food cues in rats.

Authors:  Lauren C Anderson; Gorica D Petrovich
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 10.  Physiological and neurochemical aspects of corticotropin-releasing factor actions in the brain: the role of the locus coeruleus.

Authors:  H Lehnert; C Schulz; K Dieterich
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.