Literature DB >> 16941322

Exogenous sources of pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care unit patients: implementation of infection control measures and follow-up with molecular typing.

Christiane Petignat1, Patrick Francioli, Immaculee Nahimana, Aline Wenger, Jacques Bille, Marie-Denise Schaller, Jean-Pierre Revelly, Giorgio Zanetti, Dominique S Blanc.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1998, a study in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our institution suggested possible transmission of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from faucet to patient and from patient to patient. Infection-control measures were implemented to reduce the degree of P. aeruginosa colonization in faucets, to reduce the use of faucet water in certain patient care procedures, and to reduce the rate of transmission from patient to patient.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the control measures instituted in 1999 to prevent P. aeruginosa infection and colonization in ICU patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, molecular, epidemiological investigation.
SETTING: A 870-bed, university-affiliated, tertiary care teaching hospital.
METHODS: The investigation was performed in a manner identical to the 1998 investigation. ICU patients with a clinical specimen positive for P. aeruginosa were identified prospectively. Swab specimens from the inner part of the ICU faucets were obtained for the culture on 9 occasions between September 1997 and December 2000. All patients and environmental isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).
RESULTS: Compared with the 1998 study, in 2000 we found that the annual incidence of ICU patients colonized or infected with P. aeruginosa had decreased by half (26.6 patients per 1,000 admissions in 2000 vs 59.0 patients per 1,000 admissions in 1998), although the populations of patients were comparable. This decrease was the result of the decreased incidence of cases in which an isolate had a PFGE pattern identical to that of an isolate from a faucet (7.0 cases per 1,000 admissions in 2000, vs 23.6 per 1,000 admissions in 1998) or from another patient (6.5 cases per 1,000 admissions in 2000 vs 16.5 cases per 1,000 admissions in 1998), whereas the incidence of cases in which the isolate had a unique PFGE pattern remained nearly unchanged (13.1 cases per 1,000 admissions in 2000 vs 15.6 cases per 1,000 admissions in 1998).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that infection control measures were effective in decreasing the rate of P. aeruginosa colonization and infection in ICU patients, confirming that P. aeruginosa strains were of exogenous origin in a substantial proportion of patients during the preintervention period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16941322     DOI: 10.1086/506409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  9 in total

1.  Transcriptional Responses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Potable Water and Freshwater.

Authors:  Erika L English; Kristin C Schutz; Graham G Willsey; Matthew J Wargo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Reliability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa semi-automated rep-PCR genotyping in various epidemiological situations.

Authors:  A Doléans-Jordheim; B Cournoyer; E Bergeron; J Croizé; H Salord; J André; M-A Mazoyer; F N R Renaud; J Freney
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Plumbing of hospital premises is a reservoir for opportunistically pathogenic microorganisms: a review.

Authors:  Margaret M Williams; Catherine R Armbruster; Matthew J Arduino
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 4.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa in premise plumbing of large buildings.

Authors:  Emilie Bédard; Michèle Prévost; Eric Déziel
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  A prospective survey of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and infection in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Regev Cohen; Frida Babushkin; Shoshana Cohen; Marina Afraimov; Maurice Shapiro; Martina Uda; Efrat Khabra; Amos Adler; Ronen Ben Ami; Svetlana Paikin
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.887

6.  Risk factors for colonization and infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients hospitalized in intensive care units in France.

Authors:  S Hoang; A Georget; J Asselineau; A-G Venier; C Leroyer; A M Rogues; R Thiébaut
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Antimicrobial resistance profiles and associated factors of Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas aeruginosa nosocomial infection among patients admitted at Dessie comprehensive specialized Hospital, North-East Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Habtamu Mekonnen; Abdurahaman Seid; Genet Molla Fenta; Teklay Gebrecherkos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Molecular Epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Intensive Care Units - A Review.

Authors:  D S Blanc; P Francioli; G Zanetti
Journal:  Open Microbiol J       Date:  2007-09-20

9.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a neonatal intensive care unit: molecular epidemiology and infection control measures.

Authors:  Valeria Crivaro; Anna Di Popolo; Alessandro Caprio; Antonietta Lambiase; Mario Di Resta; Tonia Borriello; Alda Scarcella; Maria Triassi; Raffaele Zarrilli
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 3.090

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.