Literature DB >> 16941313

Risk factors for recovery of imipenem- or ceftazidime-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa among patients admitted to a teaching hospital in Brazil.

Carlos Magno C B Fortaleza1, Maristela P Freire, Djalma de C Moreira Filho, Marcelo de Carvalho Ramos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of resistance to imipenem and ceftazidime among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates is increasing worldwide.
OBJECTIVE: Risk factors for nosocomial recovery (defined as the finding of culture-positive isolates after hospital admission) of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (IRPA) and ceftazidime-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA) were determined.
DESIGN: Two separate case-control studies were conducted. Control subjects were matched to case patients (ratio, 2:1) on the basis of admission to the same ward at the same time as the case patient. Variables investigated included demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and the classes of antimicrobials used.
SETTING: The study was conducted in a 400-bed general teaching hospital in Campinas, Brazil that has 14,500 admissions per year. Case patients and control subjects were selected from persons who were admitted to the hospital during 1992-2002.
RESULTS: IRPA and CRPA isolates were obtained from 108 and 55 patients, respectively. Statistically significant risk factors for acquisition of IRPA were previous admission to another hospital (odds ratio [OR], 4.21 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.40-12.66]; P=.01), hemodialysis (OR, 7.79 [95% CI, 1.59-38.16]; P=.01), and therapy with imipenem (OR, 18.51 [95% CI, 6.30-54.43]; P<.001), amikacin (OR, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.40-7.41]; P=.005), and/or vancomycin (OR, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.08-5.64]; P=.03). Risk factors for recovery of CRPA were previous admission to another hospital (OR, 18.69 [95% CI, 2.00-174.28]; P=.01) and amikacin use (OR, 3.69 [95% CI, 1.32-10.35]; P=.01).
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests a definite role for several classes of antimicrobials as risk factors for recovery of IRPA but not for recovery of CRPA. Limiting the use of only imipenem and ceftazidime may not be a wise strategy to contain the spread of resistant P. aeruginosa strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16941313     DOI: 10.1086/507288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  11 in total

1.  The quick loss of carbapenem susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa at intensive care units.

Authors:  Yamin Zou; Jiangping Lian; Ying Di; Haisheng You; Hongping Yao; Junhui Liu; Yalin Dong
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-11-14

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analyses show that carbapenem use and medical devices are the leading risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Anne F Voor In 't Holt; Juliëtte A Severin; Emmanuel M E H Lesaffre; Margreet C Vos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Introduction of ertapenem into a hospital formulary: effect on antimicrobial usage and improved in vitro susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Ellie J C Goldstein; Diane M Citron; Victoria Peraino; Tanya Elgourt; Anne R Meibohm; Shuang Lu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Risk factors and outcomes of infections caused by extremely drug-resistant gram-negative bacilli in patients hospitalized in intensive care units.

Authors:  Sameer J Patel; André P Oliveira; Juyan Julia Zhou; Luis Alba; E Yoko Furuya; Scott A Weisenberg; Haomiao Jia; Sarah A Clock; Christine J Kubin; Stephen G Jenkins; Audrey N Schuetz; Maryam Behta; Phyllis Della-Latta; Susan Whittier; Kyu Rhee; Lisa Saiman
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.918

5.  Influence of antipseudomonal agents on Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and acquisition of resistance in critically ill medical patients.

Authors:  José A Martínez; Esther Delgado; Sara Martí; Francesc Marco; Jordi Vila; Josep Mensa; Antoni Torres; Carles Codina; Antoni Trilla; Alex Soriano; Aitor Alquezar; Pedro Castro; José M Nicolás
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Acquisition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its resistance phenotypes in critically ill medical patients: role of colonization pressure and antibiotic exposure.

Authors:  Nazaret Cobos-Trigueros; Mar Solé; Pedro Castro; Jorge Luis Torres; Cristina Hernández; Mariano Rinaudo; Sara Fernández; Álex Soriano; José María Nicolás; Josep Mensa; Jordi Vila; José Antonio Martínez
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: risk factors for nosocomial infections.

Authors:  Pinar Onguru; Ayse Erbay; Hurrem Bodur; Gulseren Baran; Esragul Akinci; Neriman Balaban; Mustafa Aydin Cevik
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Risk factors and influence of carbapenem exposure on the development of carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections and infections at sterile sites.

Authors:  Michelle A Barron; Kris Richardson; Meghan Jeffres; Bruce McCollister
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-17

9.  Evaluation of Risk Factors for Antibiotic Resistance in Patients with Nosocomial Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Meliha Cagla Sonmezer; Gunay Ertem; Fatma Sebnem Erdinc; Esra Kaya Kilic; Necla Tulek; Ali Adiloglu; Cigdem Hatipoglu
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.471

10.  Risk factors for hospitalized patients with resistant or multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gowri Raman; Esther E Avendano; Jeffrey Chan; Sanjay Merchant; Laura Puzniak
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.887

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.