Literature DB >> 16941201

Complementary therapies for back pain: is the evidence getting stronger?

E Ernst1, M H Pittler, B Wider, K Boddy.   

Abstract

Back pain is the most common reason for using complementary therapies. This analysis of the trial evidence is aimed at determining whether the evidence base for or against complementary therapies for back pain is getting stronger. Two series of systematic reviews conducted with the same methodology 5 years apart were compared. The results suggest that the weight of the evidence has increased between 2000 and 2005 for a number of interventions. The direction of the evidence, however, remained unchanged for all but one therapy. We conclude that the value of complementary therapies in the management of back pain remains encouraging but not fully convincing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16941201     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-006-0395-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  8 in total

1.  Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002.

Authors:  Patricia M Barnes; Eve Powell-Griner; Kim McFann; Richard L Nahin
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2004-05-27

2.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Authors:  A R Jadad; R A Moore; D Carroll; C Jenkinson; D J Reynolds; D J Gavaghan; H J McQuay
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1996-02

Review 3.  Chiropractic: a profession at the crossroads of mainstream and alternative medicine.

Authors:  William C Meeker; Scott Haldeman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain: an updated systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration.

Authors:  Andrea D Furlan; Maurits van Tulder; Dan Cherkin; Hiroshi Tsukayama; Lixing Lao; Bart Koes; Brian Berman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Meta-analysis: exercise therapy for nonspecific low back pain.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maurits W van Tulder; Antti V Malmivaara; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey.

Authors:  D M Eisenberg; R B Davis; S L Ettner; S Appel; S Wilkey; M Van Rompay; R C Kessler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain. A meta-analysis of effectiveness relative to other therapies.

Authors:  Willem J J Assendelft; Sally C Morton; Emily I Yu; Marika J Suttorp; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Harpgophytum procumbens for osteoarthritis and low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joel J Gagnier; Sigrun Chrubasik; Eric Manheimer
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.659

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Well-being outcomes of chiropractic intervention for lower back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lynne Parkinson; David Sibbritt; Philip Bolton; Joan van Rotterdam; Inger Villadsen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Back pain amongst 8,910 young Australian women: a longitudinal analysis of the use of conventional providers, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners and self-prescribed CAM.

Authors:  David William Sibbritt; Jon Adams
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, cross over study to evaluate the analgesic activity of Boswellia serrata in healthy volunteers using mechanical pain model.

Authors:  K Prabhavathi; U Shobha Jagdish Chandra; Radhika Soanker; P Usha Rani
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.200

4.  What is the perceived impact of Alexander technique lessons on health status, costs and pain management in the real life setting of an English hospital? The results of a mixed methods evaluation of an Alexander technique service for those with chronic back pain.

Authors:  Stuart McClean; Sam Brilleman; Lesley Wye
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.