Literature DB >> 16940094

Comparative efficacies of amoxicillin, clindamycin, and moxifloxacin in prevention of bacteremia following dental extractions.

P Diz Dios1, I Tomás Carmona, J Limeres Posse, J Medina Henríquez, J Fernández Feijoo, M Alvarez Fernández.   

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacies of oral prophylactic treatment with amoxicillin (AMX), clindamycin (CLI), and moxifloxacin (MXF) in the prevention of bacteremia following dental extractions (BDE). Two hundred twenty-one adults who required dental extractions under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to a control group, an AMX group, a CLI group, and an MXF group (the individuals in the drug treatment groups received 2 g, 600 mg, and 400 mg, respectively, 1 to 2 h before anesthesia induction). Venous blood samples were collected from each patient at the baseline and 30 s, 15 min, and 1 h after the dental extractions. The samples were inoculated into BACTEC Plus aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles and were processed in a BACTEC 9240 instrument. Subculture and the further identification of the isolated bacteria were performed by conventional microbiological techniques. The prevalences of BDE in the control group, AMX group, CLI group, and MXF group were 96, 46, 85, and 57%, respectively, at 30 s; 64, 11, 70, and 24%, respectively, at 15 min; and 20, 4, 22, and 7%, respectively, at 1 h. Streptococcus spp. were the most frequently identified bacteria in all groups (44 to 68%), with the lowest percentage being detected in the AMX group (44%). AMX and MXF prophylaxis showed high efficacies in reducing the prevalence and duration of BDE, but CLI prophylaxis was noneffective. As a consequence, MXF prophylaxis is a promising antibiotic alternative for the prevention of BDE when beta-lactams are not indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16940094      PMCID: PMC1563553          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01550-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  40 in total

1.  In vitro activity of moxifloxacin against bacteria isolated from odontogenic abscesses.

Authors:  Ingo Sobottka; Georg Cachovan; Enno Stürenburg; M Oliver Ahlers; Rainer Laufs; Ursula Platzer; Dietrich Mack
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Antibiotics for prevention of endocarditis during dentistry: time to scale back?

Authors:  D T Durack
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Amoxycillin compared with penicillin V for the prophylaxis of dental bacteraemia.

Authors:  D C Shanson; P Cannon; M Wilks
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Bacterial endocarditis: a consideration for physician and dentist.

Authors:  I B Bender; I J Naidorf; G J Garvey
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  Viridans streptococci in endocarditis and neutropenic sepsis: biofilm formation and effects of antibiotics.

Authors:  E Presterl; A J Grisold; S Reichmann; A M Hirschl; A Georgopoulos; W Graninger
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Topical antibiotic prophylaxis for bacteremia after dental extractions.

Authors:  E N Vergis; P N Demas; S J Vaccarello; V L Yu
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2001-02

7.  Amoxicillin concentrations in serum, jaw cyst, and jawbone following a single oral administration.

Authors:  Y Akimoto; K Kaneko; T Tamura
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 8.  Moxifloxacin: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  What happened to the streptococci: overview of taxonomic and nomenclature changes.

Authors:  Richard Facklam
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Effect of phenoxymethylpenicillin and erythromycin prophylaxis on anaerobic bacteraemia after oral surgery.

Authors:  K Josefsson; A Heimdahl; L von Konow; C E Nord
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  17 in total

1.  Comparative efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin and clindamycin in the treatment of odontogenic abscesses and inflammatory infiltrates: a phase II, double-blind, randomized trial.

Authors:  Georg Cachovan; Rainer H Böger; Ina Giersdorf; Olaf Hallier; Thomas Streichert; Munif Haddad; Ursula Platzer; Gerhard Schön; Karl Wegscheider; Ingo Sobottka
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Microbiological analysis of a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing moxifloxacin and clindamycin in the treatment of odontogenic infiltrates and abscesses.

Authors:  Ingo Sobottka; Karl Wegscheider; Ludwig Balzer; Rainer H Böger; Olaf Hallier; Ina Giersdorf; Thomas Streichert; Munif Haddad; Ursula Platzer; Georg Cachovan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Incidence of bacteremia following bronchoscopy with argon plasma coagulation: a prospective study.

Authors:  Alona Matveychuk; Alexander Guber; Olga Talker; David Shitrit
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 4.  Microbiology of odontogenic bacteremia: beyond endocarditis.

Authors:  N B Parahitiyawa; L J Jin; W K Leung; W C Yam; L P Samaranayake
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Gender analysis of moxifloxacin clinical trials.

Authors:  Elisa Chilet-Rosell; Ma Teresa Ruiz-Cantero; Ma Angeles Pardo
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Bisphosphonates in dentistry: Historical perspectives, adverse effects, and novel applications.

Authors:  Parish P Sedghizadeh; Shuting Sun; Allan C Jones; Esmat Sodagar; Philip Cherian; Casey Chen; Adam F Junka; Jeffrey D Neighbors; Charles E McKenna; R Graham G Russell; Frank H Ebetino
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 4.626

7.  Is clindamycin effective in preventing infectious complications after oral surgery? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Iciar Arteagoitia; Fabio Rodríguez Sánchez; Amaia Figueras; Nagore Arroyo-Lamas
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.606

8.  Dental general anaesthetic receipt among Australians aged 15+ years, 1998-1999 to 2004-2005.

Authors:  Lisa M Jamieson; Kaye F Roberts-Thomson
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  An investigation of the frequency of bacteraemia following dental extraction, tooth brushing and chewing.

Authors:  Breminand Maharaj; Yacoob Coovadia; Ahmed C Vayej
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.167

10.  A comparative study of amoxicillin, clindamycin and chlorhexidine in the prevention of post-extraction bacteraemia.

Authors:  Breminand Maharaj; Yacoob Coovadia; Ahmed C Vayej
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.