Literature DB >> 16940071

Integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic indices of marbofloxacin in turkeys.

Aneliya Milanova Haritova1, Nikolina Velizarova Rusenova, Parvan Rusenov Parvanov, Lubomir Dimitrov Lashev, Johanna Fink-Gremmels.   

Abstract

Fluoroquinolones are extensively used in the treatment of systemic bacterial infections in poultry, including systemic Escherichia coli bacillosis, which is a common disease in turkey flocks. Marbofloxacin has been licensed for use in various mammalian species, but not as yet for turkeys, although its kinetic properties distinguish it from other fluoroquinolones. For example, the longer half-life of marbofloxacin in many animal species has been appreciated in veterinary practice. It is generally accepted that, for fluoroquinolones, the optimal dose should be estimated on the basis of the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of the drug under consideration. Knowledge of these specific data for the target animal species allows the establishment of an integrated PK-PD model that is of high predictive value. In the present study, the antibacterial efficacy (PD indices) against a field isolate of Escherichia coli O78/K80 was investigated ex vivo following oral and intravenous administration of marbofloxacin to turkeys (breed BUT 9; six animals per group) at a dose of 2 mg/kg of body weight (BW). At the same time, the serum concentrations of marbofloxacin were measured at different time intervals by a standardized high-performance liquid chromatography method, allowing the calculation of the most relevant kinetic parameters (PK parameters). The in vitro serum inhibitory activity of marbofloxacin against the selected E. coli strain, O78/K80, was 0.5 mug/ml in the blood serum of turkeys, and the ratio of the maximum concentration of the drug in serum to the serum inhibitory activity was 1.34. The lowest ratio of the measured serum concentration multiplied by the incubation period of 24 h to the serum inhibitory activity required for bacterial elimination was lower than the ratio of the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) to the serum inhibitory activity. These first results suggested that the recommended dose of 2 mg/kg BW of marbofloxacin is sufficient to achieve a therapeutic effect in diseased animals. However, considering the risk of resistance induction, the applied dose should be equal to an AUC/MIC of >125, the generally recommended dose for all fluoroquinolones. According to the PK-PD results presented here, a dose of 3.0 to 12.0 mg/kg BW per day would be needed to meet this criterion. In conclusion, the results of the present study provide the rationale for an optimal dose regimen for marbofloxacin in turkeys and hence should form the basis for dose selection in forthcoming clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16940071      PMCID: PMC1635179          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00711-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  46 in total

Review 1.  What have we learned from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic theories?

Authors:  J J Schentag; K K Gilliland; J A Paladino
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies in drug product development.

Authors:  Bernd Meibohm; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  The disposition of marbofloxacin in Eurasian buzzards (Buteo buteo) after intravenous administration.

Authors:  M Garcia-Montijano; S Waxman; C Sánchez; J Quetglas; M I San Andrés; F González; C Rodríguez
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.786

Review 4.  Antibiotic therapy of community respiratory tract infections: strategies for optimal outcomes and minimized resistance emergence.

Authors:  P Ball; F Baquero; O Cars; T File; J Garau; K Klugman; D E Low; E Rubinstein; R Wise
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic predictors of time to clinical resolution in patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis treated with a fluoroquinolone.

Authors:  B Meinl; J M Hyatt; A Forrest; S Chodosh; J J Schentag
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 6.  Quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M Webber; L J Piddock
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2001 May-Aug       Impact factor: 3.683

Review 7.  What do we really know about antibiotic pharmacodynamics?

Authors:  B W Gunderson; G H Ross; K H Ibrahim; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.705

8.  Characterization of high-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli O78:K80 isolated from turkeys.

Authors:  E Giraud; S Leroy-Sétrin; G Flaujac; A Cloeckaert; M Dho-Moulin; E Chaslus-Dancla
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of danofloxacin in turkeys.

Authors:  A M Haritova; N V Rusenova; P R Parvanov; L D Lashev; J Fink-Gremmels
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.459

10.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of danofloxacin in serum and tissue fluids of goats following intravenous and intramuscular administration.

Authors:  F S Aliabadi; P Lees
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.156

View more
  9 in total

1.  PK-PD Analysis of Marbofloxacin against Streptococcus suis in Pigs.

Authors:  Zhixin Lei; Qianying Liu; Bing Yang; Haseeb Khaliq; Jiyue Cao; Qigai He
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Marbofloxacin and PK/PD Modeling against Escherichia coli in Pigs.

Authors:  Zhixin Lei; Qianying Liu; Jincheng Xiong; Bing Yang; Shuaike Yang; Qianqian Zhu; Kun Li; Shishuo Zhang; Jiyue Cao; Qigai He
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Marbofloxacin in Pig against Korean Local Isolates of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.

Authors:  Md Akil Hossain; Hae-Chul Park; Kyunghun Jeong; Yang Ho Jang; Dae Gyun Kim; JeongWoo Kang; Kwang-Jick Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Optimal Regimens and Cutoff Evaluation of Tildipirosin Against Pasteurella multocida.

Authors:  Zhixin Lei; Qianying Liu; Yi Qi; Bing Yang; Haseeb Khaliq; Jincheng Xiong; Gopi Krishna Moku; Saeed Ahmed; Kun Li; Hui Zhang; Wenqiu Zhang; Jiyue Cao; Qigai He
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  In vivo pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic modeling of Enrofloxacin against Escherichia coli in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Xia Xiao; Lijie Jiang; Weixuan Lan; Yongjia Jiang; Zhiqiang Wang
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Residue Profiles of Enrofloxacin in Crucian Carp (Carassius auratus gibelio) Following Single and Multiple Oral Administration.

Authors:  Qi Shan; Heqing Huang; Guangming Zheng; Yi Yin; Xinping Zhu; Lisha Ma; Hao Zhou; Wenping Xie; Lichun Li; Shugui Liu; Jingxin Wang
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-14

7.  Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Enrofloxacin Against Escherichia coli in Broilers.

Authors:  KaNa Sang; HaiHong Hao; LingLi Huang; Xu Wang; ZongHui Yuan
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-01-07

8.  Evaluation of Marbofloxacin in Beagle Dogs After Oral Dosing: Preclinical Safety Evaluation and Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Two Different Tablets.

Authors:  Zhixin Lei; Qianying Liu; Bing Yang; Haseeb Khaliq; Saeed Ahmed; Bowen Fan; Jiyue Cao; Qigai He
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Rosmarinic Acid in Rat Cholestatic Liver Injury.

Authors:  Jianbin Min; Hao Chen; Zipeng Gong; Xian Liu; Tian Wu; Weirong Li; Jiansong Fang; Tianlai Huang; Yingfeng Zhang; Wei Zhao; Chenchen Zhu; Qi Wang; Suiqing Mi; Ningsheng Wang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.