Literature DB >> 16939702

Overcoming maternal antibody interference by vaccination with human adenovirus 5 recombinant viruses expressing the hemagglutinin and the nucleoprotein of swine influenza virus.

Ronald D Wesley1, Kelly M Lager.   

Abstract

Sows and gilts lack immunity to human adenovirus 5 (Ad-5) vectored vaccines so immunogens of swine pathogens can be expressed with these vaccines in order to immunize suckling piglets that have interfering, maternally derived antibodies. In this study 7-day-old piglets, that had suckled H3N2 infected gilts, were sham-inoculated with a non-expressing Ad-5 vector or given a primary vaccination with replication-defective Ad-5 viruses expressed the H3 hemagglutinin and the nucleoprotein of swine influenza virus (SIV) subtype H3N2. The hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titer of the sham-inoculated group (n = 12) showed continued antibody decay whereas piglets vaccinated with Ad-5 SIV (n = 23) developed an active immune response by the second week post-vaccination. At 4 weeks-of-age when the HI titer of the sham-inoculated group had decayed to 45, the sham-inoculated group and half of the Ad-5 SIV vaccinated pigs were boosted with a commercial inactivated SIV vaccine. The boosted pigs that had been primed in the presence of maternal interfering antibodies had a strong anamnestic response while sham-inoculated pigs did not respond to the commercial vaccine. Two weeks after the booster vaccination the pigs were challenged with a non-homologous H3N2 virulent SIV. The efficacy of the vaccination protocol was demonstrated by abrogation of clinical signs, by clearance of challenge virus from pulmonary lavage fluids, by markedly reduced virus shedding in nasal secretions, and by the absence of moderate or severe SIV-induced lung lesions. These recombinant Ad-5 SIV vaccines are useful for priming the immune system to override the effects of maternally derived antibodies which interfere with conventional SIV vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16939702     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  20 in total

1.  Avian influenza vaccination in chickens and pigs with replication-competent adenovirus-free human recombinant adenovirus 5.

Authors:  Haroldo Toro; Frederik W van Ginkel; De-Chu C Tang; Bettina Schemera; Soren Rodning; Joseph Newton
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.577

2.  Oral Fluids as a Live-Animal Sample Source for Evaluating Cross-Reactivity and Cross-Protection following Intranasal Influenza A Virus Vaccination in Pigs.

Authors:  Holly R Hughes; Amy L Vincent; Susan L Brockmeier; Phillip C Gauger; Lindomar Pena; Jefferson Santos; Douglas R Braucher; Daniel R Perez; Crystal L Loving
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2015-08-19

3.  Intranasal vaccination with replication-defective adenovirus type 5 encoding influenza virus hemagglutinin elicits protective immunity to homologous challenge and partial protection to heterologous challenge in pigs.

Authors:  Douglas R Braucher; Jamie N Henningson; Crystal L Loving; Amy L Vincent; Eun Kim; Julia Steitz; Andrea A Gambotto; Marcus E Kehrli
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-08-29

Review 4.  Production of adenovirus vectors and their use as a delivery system for influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Sai V Vemula; Suresh K Mittal
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.388

5.  An immunogenic and protective alphavirus replicon particle-based dengue vaccine overcomes maternal antibody interference in weanling mice.

Authors:  Laura J White; Melissa M Parsons; Alan C Whitmore; Brandon M Williams; Aravinda de Silva; Robert E Johnston
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  All-in-one bacmids: an efficient reverse genetics strategy for influenza A virus vaccines.

Authors:  Hongjun Chen; Matthew Angel; Weizhong Li; Courtney Finch; Ana Silvia Gonzalez; Troy Sutton; Jefferson Santos; Daniel R Perez
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Swine influenza virus vaccine serologic cross-reactivity to contemporary US swine H3N2 and efficacy in pigs infected with an H3N2 similar to 2011-2012 H3N2v.

Authors:  Pravina Kitikoon; Phillip C Gauger; Tavis K Anderson; Marie R Culhane; Sabrina Swenson; Crystal L Loving; Daniel R Perez; Amy L Vincent
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  Comparison of Adjuvanted-Whole Inactivated Virus and Live-Attenuated Virus Vaccines against Challenge with Contemporary, Antigenically Distinct H3N2 Influenza A Viruses.

Authors:  Eugenio J Abente; Daniela S Rajao; Jefferson Santos; Bryan S Kaplan; Tracy L Nicholson; Susan L Brockmeier; Phillip C Gauger; Daniel R Perez; Amy L Vincent
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Adverse effects of Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection on growth performance of Norwegian pigs - a longitudinal study at a boar testing station.

Authors:  Chiek Er; Bjørn Lium; Saraya Tavornpanich; Peer Ola Hofmo; Hilde Forberg; Anna Germundsson Hauge; Carl Andreas Grøntvedt; Tore Framstad; Edgar Brun
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 10.  Optimal Use of Vaccines for Control of Influenza A Virus in Swine.

Authors:  Matthew R Sandbulte; Anna R Spickler; Pamela K Zaabel; James A Roth
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2015-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.