Literature DB >> 16939565

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a high-powered parallel waterjet for wound debridement.

Mark S Granick1, John Posnett, Michael Jacoby, Shyam Noruthun, Parham A Ganchi, Ramazi O Datiashvili.   

Abstract

Current concepts of wound healing acknowledge the essential role of wound bed preparation in achieving a wound with good healing potential. Critical to wound bed preparation is the removal of necrosis, unhealthy tissue, foreign matter, and infection. One of the accepted methods of wound bed preparation is surgery. The high-power parallel waterjet is a new surgical device, which allows the operator to remove very precisely undesirable tissue and debris with maximal preservation of viable tissue. A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and economic impact of using this technique of surgical debridement. Forty patients who had waterjet debridements were compared with 22 patients with matched wounds who had conventional surgical debridement. The waterjet group had significantly fewer procedures (p<0.002) than the conventional group. Based on these outcomes, the use of the new device in appropriate patients is expected to lead to cost savings of approximately 1,900 dollars per patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16939565     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00136.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  9 in total

1.  Comparing the hydrosurgery system to conventional debridement techniques for the treatment of delayed healing wounds: a prospective, randomised clinical trial to investigate clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Jason H Ko; Erwin Secretov; Eric Huang; Christiana Chukwu; Julie West; Katherine Piserchia; Robert D Galiano
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Wound bed preparation: TIME for an update.

Authors:  Rhiannon L Harries; David C Bosanquet; Keith G Harding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Extending the TIME concept: what have we learned in the past 10 years?(*).

Authors:  David J Leaper; Gregory Schultz; Keryln Carville; Jacqueline Fletcher; Theresa Swanson; Rebecca Drake
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Management of chronic pressure ulcers: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-07-01

5.  A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial comparing hydrosurgery debridement with conventional surgical debridement in lower extremity ulcers.

Authors:  Wayne J Caputo; Donald J Beggs; Jessica L DeFede; Lisa Simm; Hussein Dharma
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  The search for 'wound solutions'.

Authors:  D Bayne
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.951

Review 7.  Debridement for surgical wounds.

Authors:  Fiona Smith; Nancy Dryburgh; Jayne Donaldson; Melloney Mitchell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-05

8.  Preparation of harvested skin using the Versajet Hydrosurgery System in full-thickness skin grafts.

Authors:  Seo Gil Choi; Hyun Woo Shin; Kun Chul Yoon
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2019-11-15

Review 9.  Clinical recommendations and practical guide for negative pressure wound therapy with instillation.

Authors:  Subhas Gupta; Allen Gabriel; John Lantis; Luc Téot
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 3.315

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.