Literature DB >> 16939372

Performance of a dose-defining insulin infusion protocol among trauma service intensive care unit admissions.

Susan S Braithwaite1, Renee Edkins, Kathy L Macgregor, Edward S Sredzienski, Michael Houston, Ben Zarzaur, Preston B Rich, Bernard Benedetto, Edmund J Rutherford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among critically ill patients, glycemic control reduces mortality and morbidities, but the use of intravenous insulin infusion is complicated by hypoglycemia. Having a standardized algorithm increases the likelihood of effective and safe utilization of intravenous insulin therapy. A tabular dose-defining protocol for intravenous insulin infusion is described, containing design elements intended to minimize risk for hypoglycemia while seeking control in a narrow target range, and performance is evaluated among critically ill trauma service patients.
METHODS: The protocol assigns insulin infusion rate (IR) for ranges of blood glucose (BG). The columns are arranged in order of increasing maintenance rate (MR) for insulin infusion. Patient column assignment is determined according to rate of change of BG. During stable column assignment, the IR is a function of column MR and BG. Within-column, the protocol formula provides that (a) for BG between 70 mg/dL and target BG, the IR increases exponentially to the column MR; and (b) for BG above upper target BG range, the IR increases linearly as an adaptation of the rule of 1800, with slope determined by the column MR. Values for IR calculated by formula are rounded to correspond to BG ranges of the table. Performance was assessed in 27 sequential runs among 24 trauma service patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit (2004-2005).
RESULTS: Using point-of-care measurements, mean preinfusion BG was 230.0 +/- 67.9 mg/dL. BG < 140 mg/dL was reached during all 27 runs (median time 5.0 h), and target BG was < 110 mg/dL during 25 runs (median time 11.0 h). For the group of runs attaining target before interruption of insulin infusion, the average +/- SD of the principal measure of glycemic control, the within-run mean BG, was 113.7 +/- 14.8 mg/dL (coefficient of variation 13%, n = 25 runs). After attaining target, the average within-run SD for BG was 22.9 mg/dL. The within-run frequency of hypoglycemic measurements (BG < 70 mg/dL) as a percentage of BG determinations was 2.4%. In this series, no instance of BG <50 mg/dL was seen.
CONCLUSIONS: This report describes a nurse-implemented tabular protocol for intravenous insulin infusion having the advantages of efficacy, safety, and simplicity of use. Wide variability of IR in the neighborhood of BG 110 mg/dL is associated with stable BG response, and protection against hypoglycemia is achieved by rapid decline of IR at BGs in or below the target range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16939372     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2006.8.476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  15 in total

Review 1.  Essential elements of the native glucoregulatory system, which, if appreciated, may help improve the function of glucose controllers in the intensive care unit setting.

Authors:  Leon DeJournett
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01-01

2.  Intermediary variables and algorithm parameters for an electronic algorithm for intravenous insulin infusion.

Authors:  Susan S Braithwaite; Hemant Godara; Julie Song; Bruce A Cairns; Samuel W Jones; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

3.  Technology to treat hyperglycemia in trauma.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03

4.  Insulin-Based Infusion System: Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Nasseh Hashemi; Tim Valk; Kim Houlind; Niels Ejskjaer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-24

Review 5.  Perioperative blood glucose monitoring in the general surgical population.

Authors:  Tejal A Raju; Marc C Torjman; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-11-01

6.  Pilot study of the SPRINT glycemic control protocol in a Hungarian medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Balazs Benyo; Attila Illyés; Noémi Szabó Némedi; Aaron J Le Compte; Attila Havas; Levente Kovacs; Liam Fisk; Geoffrey M Shaw; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-11-01

7.  Continuous glucose monitors and the burden of tight glycemic control in critical care: can they cure the time cost?

Authors:  Matthew Signal; Christopher G Pretty; J Geoffrey Chase; Aaron Le Compte; Geoffrey M Shaw
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

8.  Organ failure and tight glycemic control in the SPRINT study.

Authors:  J Geoffrey Chase; Christopher G Pretty; Leesa Pfeifer; Geoffrey M Shaw; Jean-Charles Preiser; Aaron J Le Compte; Jessica Lin; Darren Hewett; Katherine T Moorhead; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Intensive Care Unit Insulin Delivery Algorithms: Why So Many? How to Choose?

Authors:  Garry M Steil; Dorothee Deiss; Judy Shih; Bruce Buckingham; Stuart Weinzimer; Michael S D Agus
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-01

Review 10.  Hypoglycemia Prevention by Algorithm Design During Intravenous Insulin Infusion.

Authors:  Susan Shapiro Braithwaite; Lisa P Clark; Thaer Idrees; Faisal Qureshi; Oluwakemi T Soetan
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.