Literature DB >> 16939200

Resonance energy transfer between green fluorescent protein variants: complexities revealed with myosin fusion proteins.

Wei Zeng1, Harriet E Seward, András Málnási-Csizmadia, Stuart Wakelin, Robert J Woolley, Gurpreet S Cheema, Jaswir Basran, Trushar R Patel, Arthur J Rowe, Clive R Bagshaw.   

Abstract

Green fluorescent protein and its variants are frequently used as Förster (fluorescence) resonance energy transfer (FRET) pairs to determine the proximity of protein domains. We prepared fusion proteins comprising yellow fluorescent protein-Dictyostelium myosin II motor domain-cyan fluorescent protein (YFP-myosin-CFP) and compared their FRET properties with an existing construct (GFP-myosin-BFP), containing a green fluorescent protein acceptor and blue fluorescent protein donor [Suzuki, Y., Yasunaga, T., Ohkura, R., Wakabayashi, T. and Sutoh, K. (1998) Nature 396, 380-383]. The latter construct showed an apparent 40% reduction in acceptor fluorescence on ATP addition, when excited via the donor, compared with the YFP-myosin-CFP constructs which showed a small increase (<or=5%). We propose that this disparity primarily arises from the differential response of GFP and YFP on intramolecular association with the donor probe. Studies with isolated GFP and YFP at high concentrations show that they dimerize with similar K(d) values but the spectrum shifts toward the protonated state only with GFP. On excitation at 380 nm, the protonated GFPH emits at 510 nm via excited-state proton transfer, giving the appearance of extensive FRET. These findings have important implications for FRET measurements using GFP-type probes because they give rise to changes in donor and acceptor emission ratios through processes other than FRET and complicate the extraction of the true degree of energy transfer from experimental data. Furthermore, the unknown orientation factor prevents the distance of the lever arm swing from being derived from these FRET changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16939200     DOI: 10.1021/bi060943u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  6 in total

1.  Site-specific fluorescent labeling of poly-histidine sequences using a metal-chelating cysteine.

Authors:  Beena Krishnan; Aneta Szymanska; Lila M Gierasch
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.817

2.  Anomalous negative fluorescence anisotropy in yellow fluorescent protein (YFP 10C): quantitative analysis of FRET in YFP dimers.

Authors:  Xinghua Shi; Jaswir Basran; Harriet E Seward; William Childs; Clive R Bagshaw; Steven G Boxer
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Green fluorescent protein is superior to blue fluorescent protein as a quantitative reporter of promoter activity in E. coli.

Authors:  James L Lissemore; Joshua Bayes; Molly Calvey; Lucas Reineke; Anne Colagiavanni; Melissa Tscheiner; David P Mascotti
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Visualizing myosin-actin interaction with a genetically-encoded fluorescent strain sensor.

Authors:  Sosuke Iwai; Taro Q P Uyeda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Improper tagging of the non-essential small capsid protein VP26 impairs nuclear capsid egress of herpes simplex virus.

Authors:  Claus-Henning Nagel; Katinka Döhner; Anne Binz; Rudolf Bauerfeind; Beate Sodeik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Application of FRET probes in the analysis of neuronal plasticity.

Authors:  Yoshibumi Ueda; Showming Kwok; Yasunori Hayashi
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.492

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.