Literature DB >> 16938996

Acoustic properties of humpback whale songs.

Whitlow W L Au1, Adam A Pack, Marc O Lammers, Louis M Herman, Mark H Deakos, Kim Andrews.   

Abstract

A vertical array of five hydrophones was used to measure the acoustic field in the vertical plane of singing humpback whales. Once a singer was located, two swimmers with snorkel gear were deployed to determine the orientation of the whale and position the boat so that the array could be deployed in front of the whale at a minimum standoff distance of at least 10 m. The spacing of the hydrophones was 7 m with the deepest hydrophone deployed at a depth of 35 m. An eight-channel TASCAM recorder with a bandwidth of 24 kHz was used to record the hydrophone signals. The location (distance and depth) of the singer was determined by computing the time of arrival differences between the hydrophone signals. The maximum source level varied between individual units in a song, with values between 151 and 173 dB re 1 microPa. One of the purposes of this study was to estimate potential sound exposure of nearby conspecifics. The acoustic field determined by considering the relative intensity of higher frequency harmonics in the signals indicated that the sounds are projected in the horizontal direction despite the singer being canted head downward anywhere from about 25 degrees to 90 degrees. High-frequency harmonics extended beyond 24 kHz, suggesting that humpback whales may have an upper frequency limit of hearing as high as 24 kHz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16938996     DOI: 10.1121/1.2211547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Singing whales generate high levels of particle motion: implications for acoustic communication and hearing?

Authors:  T Aran Mooney; Maxwell B Kaplan; Marc O Lammers
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  A sound worth saving: acoustic characteristics of a massive fish spawning aggregation.

Authors:  Brad E Erisman; Timothy J Rowell
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Analysis of humpback whale sounds in shallow waters of the Southeastern Arabian Sea: An indication of breeding habitat.

Authors:  Madan M Mahanty; G Latha; A Thirunavukkarasu
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  All units are equal in humpback whale songs, but some are more equal than others.

Authors:  Eduardo Mercado; Christina E Perazio
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Bidirectional Interactions With Humpback Whale Singer Using Concrete Sound Elements.

Authors:  Aline Pénitot; Diemo Schwarz; Paul Nguyen Hong Duc; Dorian Cazau; Olivier Adam
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-11

6.  Passive acoustic tracking of singing humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) on a northwest Atlantic feeding ground.

Authors:  Joy E Stanistreet; Denise Risch; Sofie M Van Parijs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Humpback whale song and foraging behavior on an antarctic feeding ground.

Authors:  Alison K Stimpert; Lindsey E Peavey; Ari S Friedlaender; Douglas P Nowacek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  High source levels and small active space of high-pitched song in bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus).

Authors:  Outi M Tervo; Mads F Christoffersen; Malene Simon; Lee A Miller; Frants H Jensen; Susan E Parks; Peter T Madsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Unusual repertoire of vocalizations in the BTBR T+tf/J mouse model of autism.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Scattoni; Shruti U Gandhy; Laura Ricceri; Jacqueline N Crawley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Multivariate analysis of behavioural response experiments in humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae).

Authors:  Rebecca A Dunlop; Michael J Noad; Douglas H Cato; Eric Kniest; Patrick J O Miller; Joshua N Smith; M Dale Stokes
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.