Literature DB >> 16938983

Effect of noise on the detectability and fundamental frequency discrimination of complex tones.

Hedwig Gockel1, Brian C J Moore, Christopher J Plack, Robert P Carlyon.   

Abstract

Percent correct performance for discrimination of the fundamental frequency (0) of a complex tone was measured as a function of the level of a background pink noise (using fixed values of the difference in F0, deltaF0) and compared with percent correct performance for detection of the complex tone in noise, again as a function of noise level. The tone included some low, resolvable components, but not the fundamental component. The results were used to test the hypothesis that the worsening in F0 discrimination with increasing noise level was caused by the reduced detectability of the tone rather than by reduced precision of the internal representation of F0. For small values of deltaF0, the hypothesis was rejected because measured performance fell below that predicted by the hypothesis. However, this was true only for high noise levels, within 2-4.5 dB of the level required for masked threshold. The results indicate that the mechanism for extracting the F0 of a complex tone with resolved harmonics is remarkably robust. They also indicate that adding a background noise to a complex tone containing resolved harmonics is not a good means for equating its pitch salience with that of a complex tone containing only unresolved harmonics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16938983     DOI: 10.1121/1.2211408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Pitch discrimination interference between binaural and monaural or diotic pitches.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory Brainstem Representation of the Voice Pitch Contours in the Resolved and Unresolved Components of Mandarin Tones.

Authors:  Fei Peng; Colette M McKay; Darren Mao; Wensheng Hou; Hamish Innes-Brown
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Harmonic Cancellation-A Fundamental of Auditory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Differences between psychoacoustic and frequency following response measures of distortion tone level and masking.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Redwan Farooq; Louwai Muhammed; Christopher J Plack; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Harmonicity aids hearing in noise.

Authors:  Malinda J McPherson; River C Grace; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.157

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.