Literature DB >> 16938465

Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.

G Frank Gerberick1, Cindy A Ryan, Rebecca J Dearman, Ian Kimber.   

Abstract

The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a murine model developed to evaluate the skin sensitization potential of chemicals. The LLNA is an alternative approach to traditional guinea pig methods and in comparison provides important animal welfare benefits. The assay relies on measurement of events induced during the induction phase of skin sensitization, specifically lymphocyte proliferation in the draining lymph nodes which is a hallmark of a skin sensitization response. Since its introduction the LLNA has been the subject of extensive evaluation on a national and international scale, and has been successfully validated and incorporated worldwide into regulatory guidelines. Experience gained in recent years has demonstrated that adherence to published procedures and guidelines for the LLNA (e.g., with respect to dose and vehicle selection) is critical for the successful conduct and eventual interpretation of the data. In addition to providing a robust method for skin sensitization hazard identification, the LLNA has proven very useful in assessing the skin sensitizing potency of test chemicals, and this has provided invaluable information to risk assessors. The primary method to make comparisons of the relative potency of chemical sensitizers is to use linear interpolation to estimate the concentration of chemical required to induce a stimulation index of three relative to concurrent vehicle-treated controls (EC3). In certain situations where there are available less than optimal dose response data a log-linear extrapolation method can be used to estimate an EC3 value which can reduce significantly the need for repeat testing of chemicals. The LLNA, when conducted according to published guidelines, provides a robust method for skin sensitization testing that not only provides reliable hazard identification information but also data necessary for effective risk assessment and risk management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16938465     DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  16 in total

Review 1.  Application of proteomics in the elucidation of chemical-mediated allergic contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Tessa Höper; Franz Mussotter; Andrea Haase; Andreas Luch; Tewes Tralau
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 2.  Biology-inspired microphysiological system approaches to solve the prediction dilemma of substance testing.

Authors:  Uwe Marx; Tommy B Andersson; Anthony Bahinski; Mario Beilmann; Sonja Beken; Flemming R Cassee; Murat Cirit; Mardas Daneshian; Susan Fitzpatrick; Olivier Frey; Claudia Gaertner; Christoph Giese; Linda Griffith; Thomas Hartung; Minne B Heringa; Julia Hoeng; Wim H de Jong; Hajime Kojima; Jochen Kuehnl; Marcel Leist; Andreas Luch; Ilka Maschmeyer; Dmitry Sakharov; Adrienne J A M Sips; Thomas Steger-Hartmann; Danilo A Tagle; Alexander Tonevitsky; Tewes Tralau; Sergej Tsyb; Anja van de Stolpe; Rob Vandebriel; Paul Vulto; Jufeng Wang; Joachim Wiest; Marleen Rodenburg; Adrian Roth
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 6.043

3.  Pyridoxylamine reactivity kinetics as an amine based nucleophile for screening electrophilic dermal sensitizers.

Authors:  Itai Chipinda; Wilbes Mbiya; Risikat Ajibola Adigun; Moshood K Morakinyo; Brandon F Law; Reuben H Simoyi; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  Development and validation of a new in vitro assay designed to measure contact allergen-triggered oxidative stress in dendritic cells.

Authors:  Masaaki Miyazawa; Akira Takashima
Journal:  J Dermatol Sci       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 4.563

Review 5.  Methyl methacrylate and respiratory sensitization: a critical review.

Authors:  Jonathan Borak; Cheryl Fields; Larry S Andrews; Mark A Pemberton
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.635

6.  An Evaluation of the Occupational Health Hazards of Peptide Couplers.

Authors:  Jessica C Graham; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Martyn L Chilton; Jakub Kostal; Joel Bercu; Gregory L Beutner; Uma S Bruen; David G Dolan; Stephen Gomez; Jedd Hillegass; John Nicolette; Matthew Schmitz
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.973

7.  Perspectives on Non-Animal Alternatives for Assessing Sensitization Potential in Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Nripen S Sharma; Rohit Jindal; Bhaskar Mitra; Serom Lee; Lulu Li; Tim J Maguire; Rene Schloss; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.321

8.  Biodegradable Polymers Induce CD54 on THP-1 Cells in Skin Sensitization Test.

Authors:  Yeon Suk Jung; Reiko Kato; Toshie Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2011-08-02

Review 9.  Allergic contact dermatitis: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, in vitro methods and regulatory aspects. Current knowledge assembled at an international workshop at BfR, Germany.

Authors:  M Peiser; T Tralau; J Heidler; A M Api; J H E Arts; D A Basketter; J English; T L Diepgen; R C Fuhlbrigge; A A Gaspari; J D Johansen; A T Karlberg; I Kimber; J P Lepoittevin; M Liebsch; H I Maibach; S F Martin; H F Merk; T Platzek; T Rustemeyer; A Schnuch; R J Vandebriel; I R White; A Luch
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  Nature-derived epoxy resins: Synthesis, allergenicity, and thermosetting properties of pinoresinol diglycidyl ether.

Authors:  Niamh M O'Boyle; Ida B Niklasson; David J Ponting; Miguel A Ortega; Tina Seifert; Andreas Natsch; Kristina Luthman; Ann-Therese Karlberg
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 1.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.