A Holland1, O Thuemer, C Schelenz, N van Hout, S G Sakka. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, D-07747 Jena, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may affect hepato-splanchnic blood flow. We studied whether a PEEP of 10 mbar may negatively influence flow-dependent liver function (indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate, ICG-PDR) and splanchnic microcirculation as estimated by gastric mucosal PCO2 (PRCO2). METHODS: In a randomized, controlled clinical study, we enrolled 28 patients after elective cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass. In 14 patients (13 male, 1 female; age 48-74, mean 63 +/- 7 yr) we assessed ICG-PDR and PRCO2 on intensive care unit admission with PEEP 5 mbar, after 2 h with PEEP of 10 mbar and again after 2 h at PEEP 5 mbar. Inspiratory peak pressure was adjusted to maintain normocapnia. Fourteen other patients (8 male, 6 female; age 46-86, mean 68 +/- 11 yr) in whom PEEP was 5 mbar throughout served as controls. All patients underwent haemodynamic monitoring by measurement of central venous pressure, left atrial pressure and cardiac index using pulmonary artery thermodilution. RESULTS: While doses of vasoactive drugs and cardiac filling pressures did not change significantly, cardiac index slightly increased in both groups. ICG-PDR remained unchanged either within or between both groups (PEEP10 group: 24.0 +/- 6.9, 22.0 +/- 7.9 and 25.5 +/- 7.7% min-1 vs. controls: 22.0 +/- 7.5, 23.8 +/- 8.4 and 21.4 +/- 6.5% min-1) (P = 0.05). The difference between PRCO2 and end-tidal PCO2 (PCO2-gap) did not change significantly (PEEP10 group: 1.1 +/- 0.9, 1.3 +/- 0.7 and 1.3 +/- 0.9 kPa vs. controls: 0.8 +/- 0.5, 0.9 +/- 0.5 and 0.9 +/- 0.5 kPa). CONCLUSION: A PEEP of 10 mbar for 2 h does not compromise liver function and gastric mucosal perfusion in patients after cardiac surgery with maintained cardiac output.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may affect hepato-splanchnic blood flow. We studied whether a PEEP of 10 mbar may negatively influence flow-dependent liver function (indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate, ICG-PDR) and splanchnic microcirculation as estimated by gastric mucosal PCO2 (PRCO2). METHODS: In a randomized, controlled clinical study, we enrolled 28 patients after elective cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass. In 14 patients (13 male, 1 female; age 48-74, mean 63 +/- 7 yr) we assessed ICG-PDR and PRCO2 on intensive care unit admission with PEEP 5 mbar, after 2 h with PEEP of 10 mbar and again after 2 h at PEEP 5 mbar. Inspiratory peak pressure was adjusted to maintain normocapnia. Fourteen other patients (8 male, 6 female; age 46-86, mean 68 +/- 11 yr) in whom PEEP was 5 mbar throughout served as controls. All patients underwent haemodynamic monitoring by measurement of central venous pressure, left atrial pressure and cardiac index using pulmonary artery thermodilution. RESULTS: While doses of vasoactive drugs and cardiac filling pressures did not change significantly, cardiac index slightly increased in both groups. ICG-PDR remained unchanged either within or between both groups (PEEP10 group: 24.0 +/- 6.9, 22.0 +/- 7.9 and 25.5 +/- 7.7% min-1 vs. controls: 22.0 +/- 7.5, 23.8 +/- 8.4 and 21.4 +/- 6.5% min-1) (P = 0.05). The difference between PRCO2 and end-tidal PCO2 (PCO2-gap) did not change significantly (PEEP10 group: 1.1 +/- 0.9, 1.3 +/- 0.7 and 1.3 +/- 0.9 kPa vs. controls: 0.8 +/- 0.5, 0.9 +/- 0.5 and 0.9 +/- 0.5 kPa). CONCLUSION: A PEEP of 10 mbar for 2 h does not compromise liver function and gastric mucosal perfusion in patients after cardiac surgery with maintained cardiac output.
Authors: Ary Serpa Neto; Roberto Rabello Filho; Thomas Cherpanath; Rogier Determann; Dave A Dongelmans; Frederique Paulus; Pieter Roel Tuinman; Paolo Pelosi; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Marcus J Schultz Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 6.925
Authors: Anna Geke Algera; Luigi Pisani; Dennis C J Bergmans; Sylvia den Boer; Corianne A J de Borgie; Frank H Bosch; Karina Bruin; Thomas G Cherpanath; Rogier M Determann; Arjen M Dondorp; Dave A Dongelmans; Henrik Endeman; Jasper J Haringman; Janneke Horn; Nicole P Juffermans; David M van Meenen; Nardo J van der Meer; Maruschka P Merkus; Hazra S Moeniralam; Ilse Purmer; Pieter Roel Tuinman; Mathilde Slabbekoorn; Peter E Spronk; Alexander P J Vlaar; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Paolo Pelosi; Ary Serpa Neto; Marcus J Schultz; Frederique Paulus Journal: Trials Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Faraz Siddiqui; Moiz Ahmed; Saqib Abbasi; Akshay Avula; Abdul Hasan Siddiqui; Jobin Philipose; Hafiz M Khan; Tahir M A Khan; Liliane Deeb; Michel Chalhoub Journal: J Clin Med Res Date: 2018-12-03
Authors: Tommaso Pettenuzzo; Annalisa Boscolo; Alessandro De Cassai; Nicolò Sella; Francesco Zarantonello; Paolo Persona; Laura Pasin; Giovanni Landoni; Paolo Navalesi Journal: Crit Care Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 9.097