Literature DB >> 16937845

Screening for colorectal cancer in Italy: 2004 survey.

Manuel Zorzi1, Grazia Grazzini, Carlo Senore, Marcello Vettorazzi.   

Abstract

We present the main results of the first national survey of organised screening programmes, conducted by the Italian Group for Colorectal Cancer Screening (GISCoR). During 2004, 18 programs, adopting faecal occult blood testing (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy (FS), or a combination of both, were active in Italy. Overall, 331,333 subjects were invited to undergo FOBT and 165,480 were screened; the attendance rate (51.3%) equals the best performances reported in the literature. Positivity rate was 5.4% at first and 3.9% at repeat screening: it increased with age and was higher among men than among women in all age groups. The average attendance rate at colonoscopy (TC) was 83% (range: 70%-100%; median: 85%). Completion rate of TC was 92%, with higher rates among males. At first screening, the detection rate (DR) per 1000 screened subjects was 2.8 and 11.6 for cancer (CRC) and "high-risk" adenomas (HRA) (> or =3 adenomas, 1 adenoma > or =1 cm, or with villous component >20%, or with high grade dysplasia) respectively; the corresponding figures at repeat screening were 1.2 for CRC and 4.9 for HRA. The DR of CRC and adenomas increased with age and it was higher among men than among women; 51% of screen-detected CRCs were at TNM stage 1. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 6.3% for CRC and 25.8% for HRA at first screening, and 3.6% for CRC and 15.1% for HRA at repeat screening. Given this high PPV of positive FOBT, to obtain a high attendance at TC is crucial. In the three FS programmes 15,688 subjects were invited and 4884 were screened (attendance rate: 31.9%). TC referral rates ranged between 7.6% and 14.0%, due to different referral criteria. Among subjects referred to colonoscopy the prevalence of HRA and CRC ranged from 7.9 to 9.9%. The overall DR (subjects with at least one advanced lesion) ranged from 5.5 to 7.0%. Comparing the DR at FS and FOBT in the same age range. FS showed a higher sensitivity both for HRA (DR was four times higher) and for CRC. In conclusion, colorectal cancer screening looks feasible. The reported experiences showed good results in terms of attendance and DR, although some critical aspects need to be carefully addressed when planning and implementing screening activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16937845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Prev        ISSN: 1120-9763            Impact factor:   1.901


  5 in total

1.  An endoscopic training model to improve accuracy of colonic polyp size measurement.

Authors:  Chi-Yang Chang; Han-Mo Chiu; Hsiu-Po Wang; Ching-Tai Lee; John Jen Tai; Chia-Hung Tu; Chi-Ming Tai; Tsung-Hsien Chiang; Jason Kunming Huang; Dun-Cheng Chang; Jaw-Town Lin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography in patients with positive faecal occult blood test: results of the Italian project Legatumori 2003-2006.

Authors:  E Neri; P Vagli; F Turini; F Cerri; A Bardine; C Cecchi; G Naldini; F Costa; S Marchi; C Bartolozzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Association of FOBT-assessed faecal Hb content with colonic lesions detected in the Florence screening programme.

Authors:  S Ciatto; F Martinelli; G Castiglione; P Mantellini; T Rubeca; G Grazzini; A G Bonanomi; M Confortini; M Zappa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Body mass index & low CIR in colonoscopy!

Authors:  Adnan Qureshi; Saira BiBi; Ravi Madhotra
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2018

5.  Attitudes to colorectal cancer screening among ethnic minority groups in the UK.

Authors:  Kathryn A Robb; Ijeoma Solarin; Emily Power; Wendy Atkin; Jane Wardle
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.