Literature DB >> 16937630

Biological responses to environmental forcing: the linear tracking window hypothesis.

Chih-Hao Hsieh1, Mark D Ohman.   

Abstract

Determining the relative contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic processes to the regulation of biological populations has been a recurrent ecological issue. Recent discussions concerning ecosystem "regime shifts" again raise the question of whether population fluctuations are mainly controlled by external forcing. Results of nonlinear time series analyses indicate that pelagic populations typically do not passively track stochastic environmental variables. Rather, population dynamics are better described as nonlinear amplification of physical forcing by biological interactions. However, we illustrate that in some cases populations do show linear tracking of the physical environment. To explain why population dynamics can sometimes be linear, we propose the linear tracking window hypothesis: populations are most likely to track the stochastic environmental forcing when their generation time matches the characteristic time scale of the environmental signal. While our observations follow this hypothesis well, our results indicate that the linear tracking window is a necessary but not a sufficient condition.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16937630     DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1932:brteft]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  9 in total

1.  Slowing down of North Pacific climate variability and its implications for abrupt ecosystem change.

Authors:  Chris A Boulton; Timothy M Lenton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Resilience and stability of a pelagic marine ecosystem.

Authors:  Martin Lindegren; David M Checkley; Mark D Ohman; J Anthony Koslow; Ralf Goericke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A double-integration hypothesis to explain ocean ecosystem response to climate forcing.

Authors:  Emanuele Di Lorenzo; Mark D Ohman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  When an ecological regime shift is really just stochastic noise.

Authors:  Scott C Doney; Sevrine F Sailley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Equation-free mechanistic ecosystem forecasting using empirical dynamic modeling.

Authors:  Hao Ye; Richard J Beamish; Sarah M Glaser; Sue C H Grant; Chih-Hao Hsieh; Laura J Richards; Jon T Schnute; George Sugihara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A novel nonlinear analysis of blood flow dynamics applied to the human lung.

Authors:  Richard B Buxton; G Kim Prisk; Susan R Hopkins
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2022-04-14

7.  Evaluation of multi-scale climate effects on annual recruitment levels of the Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica, to Taiwan.

Authors:  Wann-Nian Tzeng; Yu-Heng Tseng; Yu-San Han; Chih-Chieh Hsu; Chih-Wei Chang; Emanuele Di Lorenzo; Chih-Hao Hsieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A novel multilayered multidisk oral tablet for chronotherapeutic drug delivery.

Authors:  Zaheeda Khan; Yahya E Choonara; Pradeep Kumar; Lisa C du Toit; Valence M K Ndesendo; Viness Pillay
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Stock assessment and end-to-end ecosystem models alter dynamics of fisheries data.

Authors:  Laura S Storch; Sarah M Glaser; Hao Ye; Andrew A Rosenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.