Literature DB >> 16937410

Binding affinities/avidities of antibody-antigen interactions: quantification and scale-up implications.

Huading Zhang1, P Stephen Williams, Maciej Zborowski, Jeffrey J Chalmers.   

Abstract

Bioaffinity interactions have been, and continue to be, successfully adapted from nature for use in separation and detection applications. It has been previously reported that the magnetophoretic mobility of labeled cells show a saturation type phenomenon as a function of the concentration of the free antibody-magnetic nanoparticle conjugate which is consistent with other reports of antibody-fluorophore binding. Starting with the standard antibody-antigen relationship, a model was developed which takes into consideration multi-valence interactions, and various attributes of flow cytometry (FCM) and cell tracking velocimetry (CTV) measurements to determine both the apparent dissociation constant and the antibody-binding capacity (ABC) of a cell. This model was then evaluated on peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) labeled with anti CD3 antibodies conjugated to FITC, PE, or DM (magnetic nanoparticles). Reasonable agreements between the model and the experiments were obtained. In addition, estimates of the limitation of the number of magnetic nanoparticles that can bind to a cell as a result of steric hinderance was consistent with measured values of magnetophoretic mobility. Finally, a scale-up model was proposed and tested which predicts the amount of antibody conjugates needed to achieve a given level of saturation as the total number of cells reaches 10(10), the number of cells needed for certain clinical applications, such as T-cell depletions for mismatched bone marrow transplants. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16937410     DOI: 10.1002/bit.21024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  14 in total

1.  Isolation and analysis of rare cells in the blood of cancer patients using a negative depletion methodology.

Authors:  Yongqi Wu; Clayton J Deighan; Brandon L Miller; Priya Balasubramanian; Maryam B Lustberg; Maciej Zborowski; Jeffrey J Chalmers
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Characterization and Quantification of Nanoparticle-Antibody Conjugates on Cells Using C(60) ToF SIMS in the Event-By-Event Bombardment/Detection Mode.

Authors:  Li-Jung Chen; Sunny S Shah; Jaime Silangcruz; Michael J Eller; Stanislav V Verkhoturov; Alexander Revzin; Emile A Schweikert
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Quantification of non-specific binding of magnetic micro- and nanoparticles using cell tracking velocimetry: Implication for magnetic cell separation and detection.

Authors:  J J Chalmers; Y Xiong; X Jin; M Shao; X Tong; S Farag; M Zborowski
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Quadrupole magnetic sorting of porcine islets of Langerhans.

Authors:  Rustin M Shenkman; Jeffrey J Chalmers; Bernhard J Hering; Nicole Kirchhof; Klearchos K Papas
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.056

5.  Optimization of an enrichment process for circulating tumor cells from the blood of head and neck cancer patients through depletion of normal cells.

Authors:  Liying Yang; James C Lang; Priya Balasubramanian; Kris R Jatana; David Schuller; Amit Agrawal; Maciej Zborowski; Jeffrey J Chalmers
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  A radial flow microfluidic device for ultra-high-throughput affinity-based isolation of circulating tumor cells.

Authors:  Vasudha Murlidhar; Mina Zeinali; Svetlana Grabauskiene; Mostafa Ghannad-Rezaie; Max S Wicha; Diane M Simeone; Nithya Ramnath; Rishindra M Reddy; Sunitha Nagrath
Journal:  Small       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 13.281

7.  A differential dielectric affinity glucose sensor.

Authors:  Xian Huang; Charles Leduc; Yann Ravussin; Siqi Li; Erin Davis; Bing Song; Dachao Li; Kexin Xu; Domenico Accili; Qian Wang; Rudolph Leibel; Qiao Lin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  Nanoparticles for applications in cellular imaging.

Authors:  K Ted Thurn; Ericmb Brown; Aiguo Wu; Stefan Vogt; Barry Lai; Jörg Maser; Tatjana Paunesku; Gayle E Woloschak
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.703

9.  Intrinsically magnetic susceptibility in human blood and its potential impact on cell separation: Non-classical and intermediate monocytes have the strongest magnetic behavior in fresh human blood.

Authors:  Jenifer Gómez-Pastora; James Kim; Victor Multanen; Mitchell Weigand; Nicole A Walters; Eduardo Reátegui; Andre F Palmer; Mark H Yazer; Maciej Zborowski; Jeffrey J Chalmers
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.249

10.  Microfluidic, marker-free isolation of circulating tumor cells from blood samples.

Authors:  Nezihi Murat Karabacak; Philipp S Spuhler; Fabio Fachin; Eugene J Lim; Vincent Pai; Emre Ozkumur; Joseph M Martel; Nikola Kojic; Kyle Smith; Pin-i Chen; Jennifer Yang; Henry Hwang; Bailey Morgan; Julie Trautwein; Thomas A Barber; Shannon L Stott; Shyamala Maheswaran; Ravi Kapur; Daniel A Haber; Mehmet Toner
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 13.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.