Literature DB >> 16936959

[Limbal relaxing incisions during cataract surgery: one-year follow-up].

João Carlos Arraes1, Fernando Cunha, Tatiana Azevedo Arraes, Ronald Cavalvanti, Marcelo Ventura.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate astigmatism variation between preoperative, 1st and 12th postoperative month of patients who underwent cataract surgery with limbal relaxing incisions (LRI) aiming to reduce the preoperative astigmatism.
METHODS: Sixteen patients who underwent cataract surgery by the phacoemulsification technique with a 5.5 mm escleral incision, at the Altino Ventura Foudation, between April and July of 2002. The limbal relaxing incisions were performed according to Gills' modified nomogram (1D - 1 LRI of 6 mm; 1-2D - 2 LRI of 6 mm; 2-3D - 2 LRI of 8 mm). They were done in the most curved meridians, determined by preoperative corneal topography.
RESULTS: Significant reduction in preoperative astigmatism was observed in the 1st postoperative month in 2 limbal relaxing incisions of the 6 mm group (57% topographic astigmatism and 87% refractional) and in 2 limbal relaxing incisions of the 8 mm group (50% topographic astigmatism and 65% refractional), maintaining the reduction with no significant alteration until the 12th postoperative month. The 1 limbal relaxing incision of the 6 mm group did not yield significant astigmatism reduction, but there was no significant alteration until de 12th postoperative month. There were also no complications such as postoperative discomfort, glare, aniseiconia, diplopia, incision infection and corneal thinning or ectasia.
CONCLUSION: Two limbal relaxing incisions of 8 and 6 mm aiming to correct preoperative astigmatism of 2 to 3D and 1 to 2D, respectively, were safe and effective with a stable effect in the first postoperative follow-up year. The 1 limbal relaxing incision of 6 mm aiming to reduce 1 diopter of preoperative astigmatism was not effective, but it did not induce any significant postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16936959     DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492006000300014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol        ISSN: 0004-2749            Impact factor:   0.872


  4 in total

1.  Limbal relaxing incision during cataract extraction versus photoastigmatic keratectomy after cataract extraction in controlling pre-existing corneal astigmatism.

Authors:  Sameh Fouda; Kazutaka Kamiya; Daisuke Aizawa; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Visual Performance of Tecnis ZM900 Diffractive Multifocal IOL after 2500 Implants: A 3-Year Followup.

Authors:  Leonardo Akaishi; Rodrigo Vaz; Graziela Vilella; Rodrigo C Garcez; Patrick F Tzelikis
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Toric intraocular lens versus limbal relaxing incisions for corneal astigmatism after phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Jonathan C Lake; Gustavo Victor; Gerry Clare; Gustavo Jm Porfírio; Ashleigh Kernohan; Jennifer R Evans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-17

4.  Differential time-course tear film quantitative changes following limbal relaxing incisions.

Authors:  Mohamed Attia Ali Ahmed; Ahmed Shawkat Abdelhalim
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 2.209

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.