Literature DB >> 16936567

Favorable outcome of cochlear implant in VIIIth nerve deficiency.

Diego Zanetti1, Maurizio Guida, Maria Grazia Barezzani, Chiara Campovecchi, Nader Nassif, Lorenzo Pinelli, Lucio Giordano, Giovanna Olioso.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report on the outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in a child with cochleovestibular nerves (CVN) hypoplasia. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center, University hospital. PATIENTS: An 18-month-old child with profound bilateral congenital hearing loss and bilateral hypoplasia of the CVN at imaging. INTERVENTION: Left CI at age 29 months with a Nucleus Contour device (Cochlear Ltd., Lane Cove, New South Wales, Australia) after unsatisfactory results of hearing aid use for 10 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception tests, behavioral observation, electrophysiologic tests, and cognitive evaluation.
RESULTS: Although the child scores poorly in every perceptive category with the CI alone, the device greatly enhances his speech understanding with the hearing aid in the opposite ear. In the bimodal condition, his words and sentences identification, recognition, and comprehension far exceed the monaural figures. The Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) tests reaches a score of 26/40, and the MacArthur's questionnaires confirm the improvement of language production and comprehension. These results became noticeable after 5 to 6 months and continued to improve up to the 10th month. The child's cognitive scores and overall performance competences greatly benefit from the CI, with the mental age overcoming the chronological age.
CONCLUSION: We can confirm the chance of achieving satisfactory results by CI even when the imaging of CVN is doubtful and the electrophysiological tests are disappointing. In our experience, a CI in Type IIb dysplasia of the CVN is a feasible option, provided that the candidate shows some responses at aided audiogram and at least minimal signs of language development. Adequate counseling is necessary for these children because the expected outcome is somewhat lower than that of their deaf peers with normal appearance of the nerves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16936567     DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000227899.80656.1d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of cochlear implant candidacy in patients with cochlear nerve deficiency using the P1 CAEP biomarker.

Authors:  Peter Roland; Kathryn Henion; Timothy Booth; Julia Dee Campbell; Anu Sharma
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2012-02

2.  [Cochlear implant for malformations of the inner ear].

Authors:  A Aschendorff; R Laszig; W Maier; R Beck; C Schild; R Birkenhäger; T Wesarg; S Kröger; S Arndt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Does the Width of the Bony Cochlear Nerve Canal Predict the Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation?

Authors:  Juyong Chung; Jeong Hun Jang; Sun O Chang; Jae-Jin Song; Sung-Woo Cho; So Young Kim; Jun Ho Lee; Seung-Ha Oh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  A Ten-Year Review of Audiological Performance in Children with Inner Ear Abnormalities after Cochlear Implantation in Singapore.

Authors:  Sok Yan Tay; Rosslyn Anicete; Kun Kiaang Henry Tan
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-12-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.