Literature DB >> 16936306

Differences between human embryonic stem cell lines.

C Allegrucci1, L E Young.   

Abstract

The promise of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines for treating injuries and degenerative diseases, for understanding early human development, for disease modelling and for drug discovery, has brought much excitement to scientific communities as well as to the public. Although all of the lines derived worldwide share the expression of characteristic pluripotency markers, many differences are emerging between lines that may be more associated with the wide range of culture conditions in current use than the inherent genetic variation of the embryos from which embryonic stem cells were derived. Thus, the validity of many comparisons between lines published thus far is difficult to interpret. This article reviews the evidence for differences between lines, focusing on studies of pluripotency marker molecules, transcriptional profiling, genetic stability and epigenetic stability, for which there is most evidence. Recognition and assessment of environmentally induced differences will be important to facilitate the development of culture systems that maximize stability in culture and provide lines with maximal potential for safety and success in the range of possible applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16936306     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dml041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  67 in total

Review 1.  Generation of natural killer cells from hematopoietic stem cells in vitro for immunotherapy.

Authors:  Martha Luevano; Alejandro Madrigal; Aurore Saudemont
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 11.530

2.  Nodal/Activin signaling predicts human pluripotent stem cell lines prone to differentiate toward the hematopoietic lineage.

Authors:  Veronica Ramos-Mejia; Gustavo J Melen; Laura Sanchez; Ivan Gutierrez-Aranda; Gertrudis Ligero; Jose L Cortes; Pedro J Real; Clara Bueno; Pablo Menendez
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 3.  Human ESC vs. iPSC-pros and cons.

Authors:  Jane J Pappas; Phillip C Yang
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Genetic and epigenetic X-chromosome variations in a parthenogenetic human embryonic stem cell line.

Authors:  Weiqiang Liu; Yifei Yin; Yonghua Jiang; Chaohui Kou; Yumei Luo; Shengchang Huang; Yuhong Zheng; Shaoying Li; Qing Li; Liyuan Guo; Shaorong Gao; Xiaofang Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Expansion of human embryonic stem cells: a comparative study.

Authors:  V T'joen; H Declercq; M Cornelissen
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 6.  Heart repair and stem cells.

Authors:  Linda W van Laake; Rutger Hassink; Pieter A Doevendans; Christine Mummery
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Gene-specific vulnerability to imprinting variability in human embryonic stem cell lines.

Authors:  Kee-Pyo Kim; Alexandra Thurston; Christine Mummery; Dorien Ward-van Oostwaard; Helen Priddle; Cinzia Allegrucci; Chris Denning; Lorraine Young
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Pedigreed primate embryonic stem cells express homogeneous familial gene profiles.

Authors:  Jocelyn D Mich-Basso; Carrie J Redinger; Christopher S Navara; Ahmi Ben-Yehudah; Ethan Jacoby; Elizabeta Kovkarova-Naumovski; Meena Sukhwani; Kyle Orwig; Naftali Kaminski; Carlos A Castro; Calvin R Simerly; Gerald Schatten
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 6.277

9.  Early induction of a prechondrogenic population allows efficient generation of stable chondrocytes from human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Jieun Lee; Sarah E B Taylor; Piera Smeriglio; Janice Lai; William J Maloney; Fan Yang; Nidhi Bhutani
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Epigenetic gene regulation in stem cells and correlation to cancer.

Authors:  Lesley A Mathews; Francesco Crea; W L Farrar
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.880

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.