Inga Odenholt1, Otto Cars. 1. Infectious Diseases Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lunds University S-20502 Malmö, Sweden. inga.odenholt@med.lu.se
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare in an in vitro kinetic model the pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin with a concentration-time profile simulating the human free non-protein bound concentrations of 400 mg moxifloxacin intravenous (iv) once daily, 500 mg levofloxacin iv once daily and 750 mg levofloxacin iv once daily against strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli with variable susceptibility to fluoroquinolones. METHODS: The strains used in the study included S. pneumoniae ATCC 6306 (native strain), S. pneumoniae 19397 (double mutation; gyrA and parC), S. pneumoniae 4241 (single mutation; parC), S. aureus ATCC 13709 (native strain), S. aureus MB5 (single mutation; gyrA), E. coli M12 (single mutation; gyrA), E. coli ATCC 25922 (native strain) and K. pneumoniae ATCC 29655 (native strain). The strains were exposed to moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in an in vitro kinetic model simulating the free human serum concentration-time profile of moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily, levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and 750 mg once daily. Repeated samples were taken regularly during 24 h and viable counts were carried out. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A correlation was seen between both the area under the serum concentration curve and MIC (AUC/MIC) and the peak concentration/MIC (Cmax/MIC) versus area under the bactericidal killing curve (AUBKC) or Deltalog0-24 cfu/mL. Compiling all data, an AUC/MIC of approximately 100 and a Cmax/MIC of 10 gave a maximal bactericidal effect for both levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. In accordance with the results from others, our study indicated that a lower AUC/MIC was needed for S. pneumoniae in comparison with the Gram-negative bacteria studied. Moxifloxacin yielded higher AUC/MIC and Cmax/MIC against the investigated Gram-positive bacteria in comparison with levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and 750 mg once daily.
OBJECTIVES: To compare in an in vitro kinetic model the pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin with a concentration-time profile simulating the human free non-protein bound concentrations of 400 mg moxifloxacin intravenous (iv) once daily, 500 mg levofloxacin iv once daily and 750 mg levofloxacin iv once daily against strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli with variable susceptibility to fluoroquinolones. METHODS: The strains used in the study included S. pneumoniae ATCC 6306 (native strain), S. pneumoniae 19397 (double mutation; gyrA and parC), S. pneumoniae 4241 (single mutation; parC), S. aureus ATCC 13709 (native strain), S. aureus MB5 (single mutation; gyrA), E. coli M12 (single mutation; gyrA), E. coli ATCC 25922 (native strain) and K. pneumoniae ATCC 29655 (native strain). The strains were exposed to moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in an in vitro kinetic model simulating the free human serum concentration-time profile of moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily, levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and 750 mg once daily. Repeated samples were taken regularly during 24 h and viable counts were carried out. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A correlation was seen between both the area under the serum concentration curve and MIC (AUC/MIC) and the peak concentration/MIC (Cmax/MIC) versus area under the bactericidal killing curve (AUBKC) or Deltalog0-24 cfu/mL. Compiling all data, an AUC/MIC of approximately 100 and a Cmax/MIC of 10 gave a maximal bactericidal effect for both levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. In accordance with the results from others, our study indicated that a lower AUC/MIC was needed for S. pneumoniae in comparison with the Gram-negative bacteria studied. Moxifloxacin yielded higher AUC/MIC and Cmax/MIC against the investigated Gram-positive bacteria in comparison with levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and 750 mg once daily.
Authors: Pieter Colin; Douglas J Eleveld; Michel M R F Struys; Huybrecht T'Jollyn; Luc M Van Bortel; Johannes Ruige; Jan De Waele; Jan Van Bocxlaer; Koen Boussery Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Jason A Roberts; Menino Osbert Cotta; Piergiorgio Cojutti; Manuela Lugano; Giorgio Della Rocca; Federico Pea Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Dennis A Veselkov; Ivan Laponogov; Xiao-Su Pan; Jogitha Selvarajah; Galyna B Skamrova; Arthur Branstrom; Jana Narasimhan; Josyula V N Vara Prasad; L Mark Fisher; Mark R Sanderson Journal: Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 7.652
Authors: Johanna Seeger; Sebastian Guenther; Katharina Schaufler; Stefan E Heiden; Robin Michelet; Charlotte Kloft Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2021-05-21