Literature DB >> 16936161

Is the number of documented diabetes process-of-care indicators associated with cardiometabolic risk factor levels, patient satisfaction, or self-rated quality of diabetes care? The Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study.

Ronald T Ackermann1, Theodore J Thompson, Joseph V Selby, Monika M Safford, Mark Stevens, Arleen F Brown, K M Venkat Narayan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Simple process-of-care indicators are commonly recommended to assess and compare quality of diabetes care across health plans. We sought to determine whether variation in the number of simple diabetes processes of care across provider groups is associated with variation in other quality indicators, including cardiometabolic risk factor levels, patient satisfaction with care, or patient-rated quality of care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used cross-sectional survey and chart audit data for 8,733 patients with diabetes who received care from 68 provider groups nested in 10 health plans that participated in the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes study. Analyses using hierarchical regression models assessed associations of the mean number of seven simple process measures with each of the following: HbA(1c) (A1C), systolic blood pressure (SBP), HDL and LDL cholesterol levels, patient satisfaction with care, and patient-rated quality of care.
RESULTS: After adjusting for case-mix differences across groups and plans, an average of one additional documented process of care for each patient in a group or plan was associated with significantly lower mean LDL cholesterol levels (-4.51 mg/dl [95% CI 1.46-7.58]) but not with A1C, SBP, or HDL cholesterol levels. The number of care processes documented was associated with patient satisfaction measures and self-rated quality of diabetes care.
CONCLUSIONS: Variation in the number of simple process-of-care indicators across provider groups or health plans is associated with differences in patient-centered measures of quality, but assessment of the quality of cardiometabolic risk factor control will require more advanced clinical performance indicators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16936161     DOI: 10.2337/dc06-0633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  17 in total

1.  Associations between technical quality of diabetes care and patient experience.

Authors:  Onyebuchi A Arah; Bastiaan Roset; Diana M J Delnoij; Niek S Klazinga; Karien Stronks
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Older Adults Reporting More Diabetes Mellitus Care Have Greater 9-Year Survival.

Authors:  Benjamin H Han; Caroline S Blaum; Rosie E Ferris; Lillian C Min; Pearl G Lee
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Computerized extraction of information on the quality of diabetes care from free text in electronic patient records of general practitioners.

Authors:  Jaco Voorham; Petra Denig
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Health systems, patients factors, and quality of care for diabetes: a synthesis of findings from the TRIAD study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 17.152

5.  Diabetes flow sheet use associated with guideline adherence.

Authors:  Karissa A Hahn; Jeanne M Ferrante; Jesse C Crosson; Shawna V Hudson; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Effect of advanced access scheduling on processes and intermediate outcomes of diabetes care and utilization.

Authors:  Usha Subramanian; Ronald T Ackermann; Edward J Brizendine; Chandan Saha; Marc B Rosenman; Deanna R Willis; David G Marrero
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Treatment intensification and risk factor control: toward more clinically relevant quality measures.

Authors:  Joseph V Selby; Connie S Uratsu; Bruce Fireman; Julie A Schmittdiel; Tiffany Peng; Nicolas Rodondi; Andrew J Karter; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Diabetes performance measures: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Connor; Noni L Bodkin; Judith Fradkin; Russell E Glasgow; Sheldon Greenfield; Edward Gregg; Eve A Kerr; L Gregory Pawlson; Joseph V Selby; John E Sutherland; Michael L Taylor; Carol H Wysham
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Physician compensation from salary and quality of diabetes care.

Authors:  Catherine Kim; W Neil Steers; William H Herman; Carol M Mangione; K M Venkat Narayan; Susan L Ettner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Improving Diabetes Care in Practice: findings from the TRANSLATE trial.

Authors:  Kevin A Peterson; David M Radosevich; Patrick J O'Connor; John A Nyman; Ronald J Prineas; Steven A Smith; Thomas J Arneson; Victor A Corbett; Joyce C Weinhandl; Carol J Lange; Peter J Hannan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 17.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.