OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy delivered by telephone with the same therapy given face to face in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder. DESIGN: Randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. SETTING:Two psychology outpatient departments in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 72 patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. INTERVENTION: 10 weekly sessions of exposure therapy and response prevention delivered by telephone or face to face. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Yale Brown obsessive compulsive disorder scale, Beck depression inventory, and client satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Difference in the Yale Brown obsessive compulsive disorder checklist score between the two treatments at six months was -0.55 (95% confidence interval -4.26 to 3.15). Patient satisfaction was high for both forms of treatment. CONCLUSION: The clinical outcome of cognitive behaviour therapy delivered by telephone was equivalent to treatment delivered face to face and similar levels of satisfaction were reported. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN500103984 [controlled-trials.com].
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy delivered by telephone with the same therapy given face to face in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder. DESIGN: Randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. SETTING: Two psychology outpatient departments in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 72 patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. INTERVENTION: 10 weekly sessions of exposure therapy and response prevention delivered by telephone or face to face. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Yale Brown obsessive compulsive disorder scale, Beck depression inventory, and client satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Difference in the Yale Brown obsessive compulsive disorder checklist score between the two treatments at six months was -0.55 (95% confidence interval -4.26 to 3.15). Patient satisfaction was high for both forms of treatment. CONCLUSION: The clinical outcome of cognitive behaviour therapy delivered by telephone was equivalent to treatment delivered face to face and similar levels of satisfaction were reported. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN500103984 [controlled-trials.com].
Authors: Steven Taylor; Dana S Thordarson; Truman Spring; Angela H Yeh; Kathleen M Corcoran; Kathy Eugster; Colin Tisshaw Journal: Cogn Behav Ther Date: 2003
Authors: W K Goodman; L H Price; S A Rasmussen; C Mazure; R L Fleischmann; C L Hill; G R Heninger; D S Charney Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 1989-11
Authors: Martin A Katzman; Pierre Bleau; Pierre Blier; Pratap Chokka; Kevin Kjernisted; Michael Van Ameringen; Martin M Antony; Stéphane Bouchard; Alain Brunet; Martine Flament; Sophie Grigoriadis; Sandra Mendlowitz; Kieron O'Connor; Kiran Rabheru; Peggy M A Richter; Melisa Robichaud; John R Walker Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Namkee G Choi; Mark T Hegel; Nathan Marti; Mary Lynn Marinucci; Leslie Sirrianni; Martha L Bruce Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: David C Mohr; Michelle Nicole Burns; Stephen M Schueller; Gregory Clarke; Michael Klinkman Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Lina Gega; Louise Swift; Garry Barton; Gillian Todd; Nesta Reeve; Kelly Bird; Richard Holland; Amanda Howe; Jon Wilson; Jo Molle Journal: Trials Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 2.279