RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Subject motion appears to be a limiting factor in numerous magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) applications. In particular, head tremor, which often accompanies stroke, may render certain high-resolution two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) techniques inapplicable. The reason for that is head movement during acquisition. The study objective is to achieve a method able to compensate for complete motion during data acquisition. The method should be usable for every sequence and easily implemented on different MR scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The possibility of interfacing the MR scanner with an external optical motion-tracking system capable of determining the object's position with submillimeter accuracy and an update rate of 60 Hz is shown. Movement information on the object position (head) is used to compensate for motion in real time by updating the field of view (FOV) by recalculating the gradients and radiofrequency parameter of the MR scanner during acquisition of k-space data, based on tracking data. RESULTS: Results of rotation phantom, in vivo experiments, and implementation of three different MRI sequences, 2D spin echo, 3D gradient echo, and echo planar imaging, are presented. Finally, the proposed method is compared with the prospective motion correction software available on the scanner software. CONCLUSION: A prospective motion correction method that works in real time only by updating the FOV of the MR scanner is presented. Results show the feasibility of using an external optical motion-tracking system to compensate for strong and fast subject motion during acquisition.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Subject motion appears to be a limiting factor in numerous magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) applications. In particular, head tremor, which often accompanies stroke, may render certain high-resolution two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) techniques inapplicable. The reason for that is head movement during acquisition. The study objective is to achieve a method able to compensate for complete motion during data acquisition. The method should be usable for every sequence and easily implemented on different MR scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The possibility of interfacing the MR scanner with an external optical motion-tracking system capable of determining the object's position with submillimeter accuracy and an update rate of 60 Hz is shown. Movement information on the object position (head) is used to compensate for motion in real time by updating the field of view (FOV) by recalculating the gradients and radiofrequency parameter of the MR scanner during acquisition of k-space data, based on tracking data. RESULTS: Results of rotation phantom, in vivo experiments, and implementation of three different MRI sequences, 2D spin echo, 3D gradient echo, and echo planar imaging, are presented. Finally, the proposed method is compared with the prospective motion correction software available on the scanner software. CONCLUSION: A prospective motion correction method that works in real time only by updating the FOV of the MR scanner is presented. Results show the feasibility of using an external optical motion-tracking system to compensate for strong and fast subject motion during acquisition.
Authors: Jessica Schulz; Thomas Siegert; Enrico Reimer; Christian Labadie; Julian Maclaren; Michael Herbst; Maxim Zaitsev; Robert Turner Journal: MAGMA Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Murat Aksoy; Christoph Forman; Matus Straka; Tolga Çukur; Joachim Hornegger; Roland Bammer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-08-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Joëlle K Barral; Juan M Santos; Edward J Damrose; Nancy J Fischbein; Dwight G Nishimura Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: E H Middlebrooks; C J Frost; I S Tuna; I M Schmalfuss; M Rahman; A Old Crow Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Joshua S Siegel; Jonathan D Power; Joseph W Dubis; Alecia C Vogel; Jessica A Church; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Melvyn B Ooi; Sascha Krueger; William J Thomas; Srirama V Swaminathan; Truman R Brown Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Lei Qin; Peter van Gelderen; John Andrew Derbyshire; Fenghua Jin; Jongho Lee; Jacco A de Zwart; Yang Tao; Jeff H Duyn Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.668