Repeatability and reproducibility of posterior corneal curvature measurements by combined scanning-slit and placido-disc topography after LASIK.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of posterior corneal curvature (PCC) measurements made by combined scanning-slit/Placido-disc topography (Orbscan II) after LASIK.
DESIGN: Experimental instrument validation study. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 22 consecutive postmyopic LASIK patients for the repeatability study and another 50 consecutive postmyopic LASIK patients for the reproducibility study.
METHODS: To analyze intrasession repeatability, 1 examiner measured 22 postmyopic LASIK eyes 10 times successively in the shortest time possible. To study intersession reproducibility, the same operator obtained measurements from another 50 eyes with stable refraction in 2 consecutive visits at the same time of the day between 6 and 9 months after myopic LASIK. We explored any association between residual stromal bed thickness and measurement variability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Orbscan II scanning-slit PCC data, precision, within-subject coefficient of variation (CV(w)), limits of agreement (LoA), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
RESULTS: For intrasession repeatability, precision was 0.067 mm (best-fit sphere [BFS]), 0.110 diopters (D; power within 5 mm), 0.158 D (power within 3 mm), and 0.46 (eccentricity). Repeatability was high for PCC BFS and power measurements within 3-mm and 5-mm zones (CV(w) ranged from 0.5%-1.2%) but poor for eccentricity data (CV(w), 31.6%). Correspondingly, ICCs ranged from 0.89 to 0.98 for PCC BFS and power, and the ICC was 0.20 for PCC eccentricity values. For intersession reproducibility, on average, no difference in PCC measurements could be found, indicating that when there is variability, it is due to random factors. The width of the 95% LoA between sessions was clinically acceptable for BFS (0.25 mm) and power (0.4 D [within 5 mm] and 0.6 D [within 3 mm]). Similarly, ICCs indicated good intersession reliability for BFS and power (0.98, 0.96, and 0.85 for BFS, power within 5 mm, and power within 3 mm, respectively) but poor reliability for eccentricity (0.59). Repeatability and reproducibility were unrelated to stromal bed thickness.
CONCLUSIONS: Orbscan II provides reliable post-LASIK PCC data for symmetrical parameters (BFS and power), independent of the residual stromal bed thickness, but is unreliable for measurements that are radially asymmetrical (eccentricity). Orbscan II is useful for monitoring the PCC after LASIK once the early postoperative period is over.