OBJECTIVES: Surgical ventricular restoration aims at improving cardiac function by normalization of left ventricular shape and size. Recent studies indicate that surgical ventricular restoration is highly effective with an excellent 5-year outcome in patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. We used pressure-volume analysis to investigate acute changes in systolic and diastolic left ventricular function, mechanical dyssynchrony and efficiency, and wall stress. METHODS: In 3 patient groups (total, n = 33), pressure-volume loops were measured by conductance catheter before and after surgery. The main study group consisted of 10 patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (New York Heart Association class III/IV, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%) who had surgical ventricular restoration and coronary artery bypass grafting. In this group, 7 patients had additional restrictive mitral annuloplasty. To assess potential confounding effects of restrictive mitral annuloplasty and cardiopulmonary bypass, we included a group of 10 patients (New York Heart Association class III/IV, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%) who had isolated restrictive mitral annuloplasty and a group of 13 patients with preserved left ventricular function who had isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. RESULTS: After surgical ventricular restoration, end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were reduced from 211 +/- 54 to 169 +/- 34 mL (P = .03) and from 147 +/- 41 to 110 +/- 59 mL (P = .04), respectively. Left ventricular ejection fraction (from 27% +/- 7% to 37% +/- 13%, P = .04) and end-systolic elastance (from 1.12 +/- 0.71 to 1.57 +/- 0.63 mm Hg/mL, P = .03) improved. Peak wall stress (from 358 +/- 108 to 244 +/- 79 mm Hg, P < .01) and mechanical dyssynchrony (from 26% +/- 4% to 19% +/- 6%, P < .01) were reduced, whereas mechanical efficiency improved (from 0.34 +/- 13 to 0.49 +/- 0.14, P = .03). End-diastolic pressure increased (from 13 +/- 6 to 20 +/- 5 mm Hg, P < .01), whereas the diastolic chamber stiffness constant tended to be increased (from 0.021 +/- 0.009 to 0.037 +/- 0.021 mL(-1), NS). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical ventricular restoration achieves normalization of left ventricular volumes and improves systolic function and mechanical efficiency by reducing left ventricular wall stress and mechanical dyssynchrony.
OBJECTIVES: Surgical ventricular restoration aims at improving cardiac function by normalization of left ventricular shape and size. Recent studies indicate that surgical ventricular restoration is highly effective with an excellent 5-year outcome in patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. We used pressure-volume analysis to investigate acute changes in systolic and diastolic left ventricular function, mechanical dyssynchrony and efficiency, and wall stress. METHODS: In 3 patient groups (total, n = 33), pressure-volume loops were measured by conductance catheter before and after surgery. The main study group consisted of 10 patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (New York Heart Association class III/IV, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%) who had surgical ventricular restoration and coronary artery bypass grafting. In this group, 7 patients had additional restrictive mitral annuloplasty. To assess potential confounding effects of restrictive mitral annuloplasty and cardiopulmonary bypass, we included a group of 10 patients (New York Heart Association class III/IV, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%) who had isolated restrictive mitral annuloplasty and a group of 13 patients with preserved left ventricular function who had isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. RESULTS: After surgical ventricular restoration, end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were reduced from 211 +/- 54 to 169 +/- 34 mL (P = .03) and from 147 +/- 41 to 110 +/- 59 mL (P = .04), respectively. Left ventricular ejection fraction (from 27% +/- 7% to 37% +/- 13%, P = .04) and end-systolic elastance (from 1.12 +/- 0.71 to 1.57 +/- 0.63 mm Hg/mL, P = .03) improved. Peak wall stress (from 358 +/- 108 to 244 +/- 79 mm Hg, P < .01) and mechanical dyssynchrony (from 26% +/- 4% to 19% +/- 6%, P < .01) were reduced, whereas mechanical efficiency improved (from 0.34 +/- 13 to 0.49 +/- 0.14, P = .03). End-diastolic pressure increased (from 13 +/- 6 to 20 +/- 5 mm Hg, P < .01), whereas the diastolic chamber stiffness constant tended to be increased (from 0.021 +/- 0.009 to 0.037 +/- 0.021 mL(-1), NS). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical ventricular restoration achieves normalization of left ventricular volumes and improves systolic function and mechanical efficiency by reducing left ventricular wall stress and mechanical dyssynchrony.
Authors: Jae K Oh; Eric J Velazquez; Lorenzo Menicanti; Gerald M Pohost; Robert O Bonow; Grace Lin; Anne S Hellkamp; Paolo Ferrazzi; Stanislaw Wos; Vivek Rao; Daniel Berman; Andrzej Bochenek; Alexander Cherniavsky; Jan Rogowski; Jean L Rouleau; Kerry L Lee Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-05-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: L Zhong; Y Su; L Gobeawan; S Sola; R-S Tan; J L Navia; D N Ghista; T Chua; J Guccione; G S Kassab Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2011-02-25 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Raghava S Velagaleti; Philimon Gona; Michael J Pencina; Jayashri Aragam; Thomas J Wang; Daniel Levy; Ralph B D'Agostino; Douglas S Lee; William B Kannel; Emelia J Benjamin; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 2.778