Literature DB >> 16935106

Electrophysiologic evaluation of phrenic nerve and diaphragm function after coronary bypass surgery: prospective study of diabetes and other risk factors.

Miguel A Merino-Ramirez1, Gustavo Juan, Mercedes Ramón, Julio Cortijo, Elena Rubio, Anastasio Montero, Esteban J Morcillo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Phrenic neuropathy after coronary artery bypass grafting has been related to various risk factors with conflicting results. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, characteristics, and clinical consequences of phrenic neuropathy and the influence of diabetes and other risk factors.
METHODS: We conducted an observational, prospective study of parallel groups including 94 consecutive patients subjected to coronary artery bypass grafting, half of them with diabetes and associated polyneuropathy. Electrophysiologic study of phrenic nerve conduction as the reference method, chest radiography, diaphragm ultrasound, and functional respiratory tests were performed 24 to 48 hours before and 7 days after surgery. In those patients showing phrenic neuropathy, explorations were repeated, including needle diaphragmatic electromyography, at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months or until recovery.
RESULTS: Fifteen of the 94 patients (16%) had phrenic neuropathy, 9 in the left side, 3 on the right, and 3 bilateral. Nine (60%) of the affected patients had diabetes, but diabetes did not represent a greater risk of neuropathy (relative risk 1.5, 95% confidence interval 0.6-3.9). Multivariate analysis showed no association of phrenic nerve injury with age, sex, ejection fraction, diabetes, use of internal thoracic artery, or number of grafts as risk factors. Phrenic neuropathy did not result in greater morbidity, and most patients recovered in less than 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: None of the risk factors studied, including diabetes, influenced the appearance of phrenic neuropathy, thus indicating a role for nerve damage during surgery. Low morbidity and relatively rapid recovery were observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16935106     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  5 in total

1.  Improving ultrasonic measurement of diaphragmatic excursion after cardiac surgery using the anatomical M-mode: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Daniela Pasero; Adrien Koeltz; Rui Placido; Mariana Fontes Lima; Olivia Haun; Mario Rienzo; David Marrache; Romain Pirracchio; Denis Safran; Bernard Cholley
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Significant diaphragm elevation suggestive of phrenic nerve injury after thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer: an underestimated problem.

Authors:  Luigi Ventura; Weigang Zhao; Tangbing Chen; Zhexin Wang; Jian Feng; Zhitao Gu; Chunyu Ji; Wentao Fang
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10

3.  Can lung volumes and capacities be used as an outcome measure for phrenic nerve recovery after cardiac surgeries?

Authors:  Salwa B El-Sobkey; Naguib A Salem
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2010-10-29

4.  Difficulties in tracheal extubation due to phrenic nerve injury during massive mediastinal tumor resection: A case report.

Authors:  Kui-Rong Wang; Fan-Fan Liu; Yan-Feng Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 5.  Diaphragm Ultrasound in Cardiac Surgery: State of the Art.

Authors:  Abdallah Fayssoil; Nicolas Mansencal; Lee S Nguyen; David Orlikowski; Hélène Prigent; Jean Bergounioux; Djillali Annane; Frédéric Lofaso
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.