Literature DB >> 16934654

National study of emergency department visits for sepsis, 1992 to 2001.

Matthew C Strehlow1, Stephen D Emond, Nathan I Shapiro, Andrea J Pelletier, Carlos A Camargo.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Epidemiologic data on emergency department (ED) patients with sepsis are limited. Inpatient discharge records from 1979 to 2000 show that hospitalizations for sepsis are increasing. We examine the epidemiology of sepsis in US EDs and the hypothesis that sepsis visits are increasing.
METHODS: The National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data (1992 to 2001) provided nationally representative estimates of frequency and disposition in adult ED visits for sepsis. Sepsis visits were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes; severe sepsis was defined as sepsis in conjunction with organ failure.
RESULTS: Of 712 million adult visits during the 10-year period, approximately 2.8 million (0.40%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33% to 0.46%) were related to sepsis. We found no significant increase in overall ED visits for sepsis from 1992 to 2001 (P for trend=.09). ED patients with sepsis were more likely to be elderly, non-Hispanic, and publicly insured and to arrive by ambulance compared with nonsepsis patients (all P<.01). The overall admission rate was 87% (95% CI 82% to 92%), with only 12% (95% CI 8% to 16%) of patients admitted to the ICU. The most frequent codiagnoses were pneumonia (13%), urinary tract infection (13%), and dehydration (11%). Severe sepsis accounted for 8% (95% CI 5% to 11%) of sepsis visits, for an annual incidence of 0.01%; 98% of patients with severe sepsis were admitted.
CONCLUSION: In contrast to data from hospital discharges, ED visits for sepsis demonstrated no increase. Most ED visits for sepsis resulted in admission to non-critical care units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16934654     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  41 in total

1.  Prospective external validation of the clinical effectiveness of an emergency department-based early goal-directed therapy protocol for severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Alan E Jones; Anne Focht; James M Horton; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Predicting mortality in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome: an evaluation of two prognostic models, two soluble receptors, and a macrophage migration inhibitory factor.

Authors:  K Kofoed; J Eugen-Olsen; J Petersen; K Larsen; O Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Not the end of end-tidal CO2.

Authors:  Kaushal Shah
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 4.  Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Manu Shankar-Hari; Gary S Phillips; Mitchell L Levy; Christopher W Seymour; Vincent X Liu; Clifford S Deutschman; Derek C Angus; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Association of γδ T cells with disease severity and mortality in septic patients.

Authors:  Juan C Andreu-Ballester; Constantino Tormo-Calandín; Carlos Garcia-Ballesteros; J Pérez-Griera; Victoria Amigó; Amadeo Almela-Quilis; Juan Ruiz del Castillo; Carlos Peñarroja-Otero; Ferran Ballester
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-03-20

6.  Prognostic value of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis scoring system for overt disseminated intravascular coagulation in emergency department sepsis.

Authors:  Q Yin; B Liu; Y Chen; Y Zhao; C Li
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Human ghrelin ameliorates organ injury and improves survival after radiation injury combined with severe sepsis.

Authors:  Kavin G Shah; Rongqian Wu; Asha Jacob; Steven A Blau; Youxin Ji; Weifeng Dong; Corrado P Marini; Thanjavur S Ravikumar; Gene F Coppa; Ping Wang
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 6.354

8.  A Computerized Alert Screening for Severe Sepsis in Emergency Department Patients Increases Lactate Testing but does not Improve Inpatient Mortality.

Authors:  T Berger; A Birnbaum; P Bijur; G Kuperman; P Gennis
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Febrile neutropenia in French emergency departments: results of a prospective multicentre survey.

Authors:  Stéphanie André; Pierre Taboulet; Caroline Elie; Noël Milpied; Michel Nahon; Gérald Kierzek; Mariève Billemont; Franck Perruche; Sandrine Charpentier; Hélène Clément; Jean-Louis Pourriat; Yann-Erick Claessens
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Pro/con debate: do the benefits of regionalized critical care delivery outweigh the risks of interfacility patient transport?

Authors:  Jeffrey M Singh; Russell D MacDonald
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.