Literature DB >> 16934432

The influence of personal familiarity on object naming, knowledge, and use in dementia.

Tania Giovannetti1, Nicole Sestito, David J Libon, Kara S Schmidt, Jennifer L Gallo, Matthew Gambino, Evangelia G Chrysikou.   

Abstract

Reports of semantic dementia patients have shown more accurate identification and use for personal objects than unfamiliar analogs of the same objects (e.g., personal comb versus experimenter's comb) [Bozeat, S., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (2002). The influence of personal familiarity and context on object use in semantic dementia. Neurocase, 8, 127-134; Snowden, J. S., Griffiths, H., & Neary, D. (1994). Semantic dementia: Autobiographical contribution to preservation of meaning. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 265-288]. Despite potential clinical implications, the personal object advantage has not been explored in various dementia populations. Sixteen mild to moderate dementia patients were tested with 12-15 of their personal objects and laboratory analog objects. Four tasks were administered: Naming, Gesture, Semantic/Script Generation, and Personal Object Decision (i.e., Is this yours?). Although 25% of the sample performed at chance in identifying personal objects as their own, participants generated more specific information (t=2.3, p=.03) and more accurate gestures (t=2.4, p=.03) for personal objects. Thus, the personal object advantage was observed for script/semantic knowledge and movement sequences, and should be considered in residential planning for various dementia patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16934432     DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0887-6177            Impact factor:   2.813


  8 in total

Review 1.  Apraxia and Alzheimer's disease: review and perspectives.

Authors:  Mathieu Lesourd; Didier Le Gall; Josselin Baumard; Bernard Croisile; Christophe Jarry; François Osiurak
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  The importance of multiple assessments of object knowledge in semantic dementia: the case of the familiar objects task.

Authors:  Evangelia G Chrysikou; Tania Giovannetti; Denene M Wambach; Abigail C Lyon; Murray Grossman; David J Libon
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 0.881

3.  Visual personal familiarity in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Luisa Jurjanz; Markus Donix; Eva C Amanatidis; Shirin Meyer; Katrin Poettrich; Thomas Huebner; Damaris Baeumler; Michael N Smolka; Vjera A Holthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Suicidal behavior and loss of the future self in semantic dementia.

Authors:  Julia J Hsiao; Natalie Kaiser; Sylvia S Fong; Mario F Mendez
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Semantic Feature Training in Combination with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Progressive Anomia.

Authors:  Jinyi Hung; Ashley Bauer; Murray Grossman; Roy H Hamilton; H B Coslett; Jamie Reilly
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  The goal-control model: An integrated neuropsychological framework to explain impaired performance of everyday activities.

Authors:  Tania Giovannetti; Rachel Mis; Katherine Hackett; Stephanie M Simone; Molly B Ungrady
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Similarities between Cognitive Models of Language Production and Everyday Functioning: Implications for Development of Interventions for Functional Difficulties.

Authors:  Rachel Mis; Tania Giovannetti
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-06-14

8.  Preservation of Person-Specific Semantic Knowledge in Semantic Dementia: Does Direct Personal Experience Have a Specific Role?

Authors:  Julie A Péron; Pascale Piolino; Sandrine Le Moal-Boursiquot; Isabelle Biseul; Emmanuelle Leray; Laetitia Bon; Béatrice Desgranges; Francis Eustache; Serge Belliard
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.