Literature DB >> 16934109

Attributable cost of methicillin resistance: an issue that is difficult to evaluate.

Jean-François Timsit1.   

Abstract

Estimating the consequences and the cost of methicillin resistance is a difficult challenge. Patients who develop methicillin-resistant ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are very different from those who develop methicillin-sensitive VAP, and biased estimates are frequent. We reviewed some important confounding factors of which the reader should be aware.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16934109      PMCID: PMC1750996          DOI: 10.1186/cc4994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


In the previous issue of Critical Care, Shorr and coworkers [1] provided new data on the morbidity and cost burden attributable to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-associated early-onset pneumonia (EOP). Based on the data recorded by 42 US hospitals, those investigators found methicillin resistance to be associated with a significant 4- to 6-day excess in mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit (ICU) and in-hospital days. It was associated with a nonsignificant increase of about US$8000 in total costs, after controlling for case mix and severity. The authors made particular effort to select monomicrobial pneumonias and to adjust the calculations based on underlying illness, and on the severity and duration of ICU stay before EOP. However, this estimated increase in costs should be regarded with caution because of a number of potential biases associated with this type of analysis. First, the observed incidence of EOP was very low. The overall risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is between 9.7% and 22.8% [2]. EOP represents at least one-third of cases. Consequently, the rate of EOP should be higher than 3.2% [3]. Because Shorr and coworkers found that only 499 episodes were recorded in 42 hospitals over 2 years, this suggests that the incidence was unusually low or that EOP was largely under-reported. This could have introduced bias because unrecognized episodes might be different (probably less severe) than reported ones. Any under-recognition of EOP might have resulted from the known lack of reproducibility of ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition) [4]. Moreover, MRSA VAP has been reported to occur mainly late in the ICU stay [5-8]; MRSA represents fewer than 5% of micro-organisms encountered in EOP episodes [9]. The factors that impact on outcomes of EOP may be different from those in late-onset pneumonia [9,10]. For example, EOP is associated a shorter ICU stay, with significantly fewer days of mechanical ventilation, of central vein catheterization and of use of ICU resources [9]. This fact probably largely explained why the ICU length of stay (4 days) was considerably lower in the report by Shorr and coworkers than in the recent report by Combes and coworkers (i.e. 11 days) [5]. Second, MRSA and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) EOP were not matched for the same hospital, and therefore variability in charges between hospitals could account for some of the observed differences. Surprisingly, the authors found that the ICU resources and extra costs related to MRSA EOP were higher only for survivors, as opposed to MSSA EOP. On the contrary, deaths occurred earlier in fatal MRSA EOP, leading to lower hospital costs for nonsurvivors. Because MRSA VAP has not been associated with higher rates of organ dysfunction than MSSA VAP [5], the potential causes of this finding are speculative (e.g. differences in the rate of do-not-resuscitate orders, differences in case mix, differences in the adequacy of antimicrobial treatment, or chance) and might have had a confounding impact on the final result. Despite these limitations, economic studies such as that conducted by Shorr and coworkers [1] provided further evidence of the cost of MRSA infections and provide new arguments for funding the fight against MRSA spread in the ICU.

Abbreviations

EOP = early-onset pneumonia; ICU = intensive care unit; MRSA = methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA = methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; VAP = ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  10 in total

1.  Does clinical evidence support ICD-9-CM diagnosis coding of complications?

Authors:  E P McCarthy; L I Iezzoni; R B Davis; R H Palmer; M Cahalane; M B Hamel; K Mukamal; R S Phillips; D T Davies
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Is methicillin resistance associated with a worse prognosis in Staphylococcus aureus ventilator-associated pneumonia?

Authors:  Jean-Ralph Zahar; Christophe Clec'h; Muriel Tafflet; Maite Garrouste-Orgeas; Samir Jamali; Bruno Mourvillier; Arnaud De Lassence; Adrien Descorps-Declere; Christophe Adrie; Marie-Alliette Costa de Beauregard; Elie Azoulay; Carole Schwebel; Jean-Francois Timsit
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Clinical and epidemiological findings in mechanically-ventilated patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia.

Authors:  M Pujol; X Corbella; C Peña; R Pallares; J Dorca; R Verdaguer; A Diaz-Prieto; J Ariza; F Gudiol
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Mortality associated with late-onset pneumonia in the intensive care unit: results of a multi-center cohort study.

Authors:  Pierre Moine; Jean-François Timsit; Arnaud De Lassence; Gilles Troché; Jean-Philippe Fosse; Corrine Alberti; Yves Cohen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  A comparative analysis of patients with early-onset vs late-onset nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU setting.

Authors:  E H Ibrahim; S Ward; G Sherman; M H Kollef
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 6.  Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nasia Safdar; Cameron Dezfulian; Harold R Collard; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Impact of methicillin resistance on outcome of Staphylococcus aureus ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  Alain Combes; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Jean-Yves Fagon; Michel Wollf; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Claude Gibert; Jean Chastre
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Sedation, sucralfate, and antibiotic use are potential means for protection against early-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  C Bornstain; E Azoulay; A De Lassence; Y Cohen; M A Costa; B Mourvillier; A Descorps-Declere; M Garrouste-Orgeas; M Thuong; B Schlemmer; J-F Timsit
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Ventilator-associated pneumonia by Staphylococcus aureus. Comparison of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive episodes.

Authors:  J Rello; A Torres; M Ricart; J Valles; J Gonzalez; A Artigas; R Rodriguez-Roisin
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Morbidity and cost burden of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in early onset ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  Andrew F Shorr; Ying P Tabak; Vikas Gupta; R S Johannes; Larry Z Liu; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 9.097

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.