Literature DB >> 16933768

Decision biases in intertemporal choice and choice under uncertainty: testing a common account.

Gretchen B Chapman1, Bethany J Weber.   

Abstract

Two experiments were performed to test a psychophysical account of parallels between biases in risky choice and intertemporal choice. Experiment 1 demonstrated the common difference effect in intertemporal choice and the common ratio effect in risky choice. As was predicted, these two biases were uncorrelated with each other, although each was correlated across monetary/health domains. This result is consistent with the supposition that these two biases result from psychophysical properties of two different dimensions (time and probability, respectively). Experiment 2 examined the magnitude effect in intertemporal choice and the peanuts effect in risky choice. These two biases were correlated with each other but were uncorrelated across monetary/health domains. This result is consistent with the supposition that these two biases result from psychophysical properties of the same dimension (utility of money or health).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16933768     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  Time Preference for Health: A Test of Stationarity versus Decreasing Timing Aversion.

Authors:  Han Bleichrodt; Magnus Johannesson
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes.

Authors:  L Green; J Myerson; P Ostaszewski
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 3.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.

Authors:  G Ainslie
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 4.  A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Subjective probability and delay.

Authors:  H Rachlin; A Raineri; D Cross
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase.

Authors:  K N Kirby; N N Maraković
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

7.  Temporal discounting and utility for health and money.

Authors:  G B Chapman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward.

Authors:  L Green; J Myerson; E McFadden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

9.  Risk attitude and time discounting.

Authors:  G Chapman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Discount functions and the measurement of patients' values. Women's decisions during childbirth.

Authors:  J J Christensen-Szalanski
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  9 in total

1.  The effects of payout and probability magnitude on the Allais paradox.

Authors:  Bethany J Weber
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

Review 2.  Uncertainty and Demand for Insurance: A Theoretical Model of How Self-Control Manages the Optimal Decision-Making.

Authors:  Mattia Adamo; Andrea P Malizia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-08-17

3.  The subjective value of delayed and probabilistic outcomes: Outcome size matters for gains but not for losses.

Authors:  Suzanne H Mitchell; Vanessa B Wilson
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Neural dissociation of delay and uncertainty in intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Christian C Luhmann; Marvin M Chun; Do-Joon Yi; Daeyeol Lee; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The neural substrates of probabilistic and intertemporal decision making.

Authors:  Bethany J Weber; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  Shared decision making in mental health: prospects for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Robert E Drake; Delia Cimpean; William C Torrey
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.986

7.  Departures from optimality when pursuing multiple approach or avoidance goals.

Authors:  Timothy Ballard; Gillian Yeo; Andrew Neal; Simon Farrell
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2016-03-10

8.  Temporal decision-making: insights from cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Christian C Luhmann
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  How costs influence decision values for mixed outcomes.

Authors:  Deborah Talmi; Alex Pine
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.