Literature DB >> 16933680

Count data in psychological applied research.

Jaume Vives1, Josep-Maria Losilla, María-Florencia Rodrigo.   

Abstract

As some authors have noticed in fields other than psychology, level of measurement and distributional characteristics of count data are commonly not taken into account, so that they are analysed as normally distributed continuous variables, and therefore some general linear model is applied. In this work, we review a random sample of 457 articles published in the last four years in journals with the highest impact factor in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR Social Sciences Edition) of the Institute for Scientific Information. The goals are to know how often count variables appear in psychological applied research and which data analyses are used when dealing with count response variables. Examination showed that there is a notable presence of count variables, especially in some topics in psychology and a remarkable misapplication of the general linear model. One deals with causes and consequences of this approach to data analysis and suggests the use of specific models to analyse count data.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16933680     DOI: 10.2466/pr0.98.3.821-835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rep        ISSN: 0033-2941


  6 in total

1.  Executive function and other cognitive deficits are distal risk factors of generalized anxiety disorder 9 years later.

Authors:  Nur Hani Zainal; Michelle G Newman
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 7.723

2.  The role of the right temporoparietal junction in the elicitation of vicarious experiences and detection accuracy while observing pain and touch.

Authors:  S Vandenbroucke; L Bardi; C Lamm; L Goubert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differences in picture naming between children with cochlear implants and children with typical hearing.

Authors:  C Cambra; J M Losilla; N Mena; E Pérez
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-11-30

4.  Evidence-based practice implementation: the impact of public versus private sector organization type on organizational support, provider attitudes, and adoption of evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Gregory A Aarons; David H Sommerfeld; Christine M Walrath-Greene
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Vicarious pain while observing another in pain: an experimental approach.

Authors:  S Vandenbroucke; G Crombez; D M L Van Ryckeghem; M Brass; S Van Damme; L Goubert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Observing another in pain facilitates vicarious experiences and modulates somatosensory experiences.

Authors:  Sophie Vandenbroucke; Geert Crombez; Tom Loeys; Liesbet Goubert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.