Literature DB >> 16931978

Airway injuries after one-lung ventilation: a comparison between double-lumen tube and endobronchial blocker: a randomized, prospective, controlled trial.

Heike Knoll1, Stephan Ziegeler, Jan-Uwe Schreiber, Heiko Buchinger, Patric Bialas, Kirill Semyonov, Thomas Graeter, Thomas Mencke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vocal cord injuries, postoperative hoarseness, and sore throat are common complications after general anesthesia. One-lung ventilation can be achieved via two techniques: double-lumen endotracheal tube or endobronchial blocker such as the Arndt blocker. The current study was designed to assess the impact of these techniques for one-lung ventilation on the incidence and severity of postoperative hoarseness, vocal cord lesions, and sore throat.
METHODS: In this prospective trial, 60 patients were randomly assigned to two groups. One-lung ventilation was achieved with either an endobronchial blocker (blocker group) or a double-lumen-tube (double-lumen group). Postoperative hoarseness and sore throat were assessed at 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery. Bronchial injuries and vocal cord lesions were examined by bronchoscopy immediately after surgery.
RESULTS: In 56 included patients, postoperative hoarseness occurred significantly more frequently in the double-lumen group compared with the blocker group: 44% versus 17%, respectively (P = 0.046). Similar findings were observed for vocal cord lesions: 44% versus 17%, respectively (P = 0.046). The incidence of bronchial injuries was comparable between groups (P = 0.540). Cumulative number of days with hoarseness and sore throat were significantly increased in the double-lumen group compared with the blocker group (P < 0.01). No major complications such as bronchial ruptures were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of an increased incidence of minor airway injuries that may impair patient satisfaction when using a double-lumen tube instead of an endobronchial blocker for one-lung ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16931978     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200609000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  48 in total

1.  Single lumen endotracheal intubation with carbon dioxide insufflation for lung isolation in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Raul Caso; Colleen Hamm Kelly; M Blair Marshall
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Laryngopharyngeal morbidity following general anaesthesia. Anaesthesiological and laryngological aspects].

Authors:  A Reber; L Hauenstein; M Echternach
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  [Laryngeal alterations following endotracheal intubation and use of larynx masks].

Authors:  M Echternach; T Mencke; B Richter; A Reber
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  Dexamethasone for preventing postoperative sore throat: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  L Sun; R Guo; L Sun
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Effective use of bronchial blockers in lung isolation surgery: an analysis of 130 cases.

Authors:  Logan Kosarek; Eric Busch; Abbas Abbas; Jason Falterman; Bobby D Nossaman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

6.  Developing Modules to Train Anesthesiology Residents & Medical Students in a Lung Isolation Technique.

Authors:  Edward D Foley; Nadine Odo; Mary E Arthur
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2017-04-01

7.  Minimal access mediastinal surgery: One or two lung ventilation?

Authors:  Karamollah Toolabi; Ali Aminian; Mihan J Javid; Rasoul Mirsharifi; Abbas Rabani
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  Nonintubated video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Ming-Hui Hung; Shun-Mao Yang; Jin-Shing Chen
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-02-13

9.  Non-intubated thoracoscopic bullectomy under sedation is safe and comfortable in the perioperative period.

Authors:  Jinwook Hwang; Jae Seung Shin; Joo Hyung Son; Too Jae Min
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  A comparison between two lung ventilation with CO2 artificial pneumothorax and one lung ventilation during thoracic phase of minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Miao Lin; Yaxing Shen; Hao Wang; Yong Fang; Cheng Qian; Songtao Xu; Di Ge; Mingxiang Feng; Lijie Tan; Qun Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.