Literature DB >> 16931963

Correlation of pathologic features with CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) by quantitative DNA methylation analysis in colorectal carcinoma.

Shuji Ogino1, Robert D Odze, Takako Kawasaki, Mohan Brahmandam, Gregory J Kirkner, Peter W Laird, Massimo Loda, Charles S Fuchs.   

Abstract

Extensive gene promoter methylation in colorectal carcinoma has been termed the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). Previous studies on CIMP used primarily methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which, unfortunately, may detect low levels of methylation that has little or no biological significance. Utilizing quantitative real-time PCR (MethyLight), we measured DNA methylation in a panel of 5 CIMP-specific gene promoters (CACNA1G, CDKN2A (p16), CRABP1, MLH1, and NEUROG1) in 459 colorectal carcinomas obtained from 2 large prospective cohort studies. CIMP was defined as tumors that showed methylation in >or=4/5 promoters. CIMP was significantly associated with the presence of mucinous or signet ring cell morphology, marked Crohn's-like lymphoid reaction, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, marked peritumoral lymphocytic reaction, tumor necrosis, tumor cell sheeting, and poor differentiation. All these features have previously been associated with microsatellite instability (MSI). Therefore, we divided the 459 colorectal carcinomas into 6 subtypes, namely, MSI-high (MSI-H)/CIMP, MSI-H/non-CIMP, MSI-low (MSI-L)/CIMP, MSI-L/non-CIMP, microsatellite stable/CIMP, and micro satellite sstable/non-CIMP. Compared with MSI-H/non-CIMP, MSI-H/CIMP was associated with marked tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor necrosis, sheeting, and poor differentiation (all P<or=0.05). Compared with MSI-L/non-CIMP, MSI-L/CIMP was associated with tumors that had <50% signet ring cell component, marked tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and poor differentiation (all P<0.05). In conclusion, several pathologic features that have previously been shown to be associated with MSI are also significantly associated with CIMP. Both MSI and CIMP appear to play a role in the pathogenesis of specific morphologic patterns of colorectal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16931963     DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213266.84725.d0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  39 in total

Review 1.  Molecular pathological epidemiology of colorectal neoplasia: an emerging transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary field.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Andrew T Chan; Charles S Fuchs; Edward Giovannucci
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Differential clinicopathological features in microsatellite instability-positive colorectal cancers depending on CIMP status.

Authors:  Jeong Mo Bae; Mi Jung Kim; Jung Ho Kim; Jae Moon Koh; Nam-Yun Cho; Tae-You Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  CIMP and colon cancer gets more complicated.

Authors:  William M Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Molecular classification and correlates in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Ajay Goel
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Fusobacterium in colonic flora and molecular features of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tomomitsu Tahara; Eiichiro Yamamoto; Hiromu Suzuki; Reo Maruyama; Woonbok Chung; Judith Garriga; Jaroslav Jelinek; Hiro-o Yamano; Tamotsu Sugai; Byonggu An; Imad Shureiqi; Minoru Toyota; Yutaka Kondo; Marcos R H Estécio; Jean-Pierre J Issa
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Cancer immunology--analysis of host and tumor factors for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Jérôme Galon; Charles S Fuchs; Glenn Dranoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Body mass index and risk of colorectal carcinoma subtypes classified by tumor differentiation status.

Authors:  Akiko Hanyuda; Yin Cao; Tsuyoshi Hamada; Jonathan A Nowak; Zhi Rong Qian; Yohei Masugi; Annacarolina da Silva; Li Liu; Keisuke Kosumi; Thing Rinda Soong; Iny Jhun; Kana Wu; Xuehong Zhang; Mingyang Song; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Andrew T Chan; Charles S Fuchs; Edward L Giovannucci; Shuji Ogino; Reiko Nishihara
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Pathologic factors are more important than tumor location in long-term survival in colon cancer.

Authors:  L G J Leijssen; A M Dinaux; H Kunitake; L G Bordeianou; D L Berger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Aberrant p16((INK4a)) methylation is a frequent event in colorectal cancers: prognostic value and relation to mRNA expression and immunoreactivity.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Mitomi; Naoshi Fukui; Nobuho Tanaka; Hideki Kanazawa; Tsuyoshi Saito; Takashi Matsuoka; Takashi Yao
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Epigenetic inactivation of the novel candidate tumor suppressor gene ITIH5 in colon cancer predicts unfavorable overall survival in the CpG island methylator phenotype.

Authors:  Vera Kloten; Michael Rose; Sophie Kaspar; Saskia von Stillfried; Ruth Knüchel; Edgar Dahl
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 4.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.