Literature DB >> 16931779

Frequency and determinants of nonpublication of research in the stroke literature.

Nerses Sanossian1, Arbi G Ohanian, Jeffrey L Saver, Linda I Kim, Bruce Ovbiagele.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Selective nonpublication will yield publication bias and a published literature imperfectly representative of the full range of scientific findings. We evaluated the proportion of research abstracts presented at the leading United States research meeting in stroke, the International Stroke Conference (ISC), which were subsequently published as full-length articles and investigated the factors associated with full manuscript publication.
METHODS: Features of all abstracts presented at the annual ISC meeting in February 2000 were analyzed. Search of the National Library of Medicine PubMed database and written communication with abstract authors was performed to determine conversion of abstracts to fully published manuscripts over the subsequent 5 years.
RESULTS: Among the 353 abstracts presented at the 2000 International Stroke Conference, 108 were oral presentations and 245 posters. Overall, 202/353 (62.3%) resulted in full-length publications, with a median time to publication of 15 months. In multivariate analysis, factors increasing likelihood of full-length publication were: platform rather than poster presentations (odds ratio [OR] 3.0, 95% CI, 1.6 to 5.5), authors with a university affiliation (OR 2.2, 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.1), and European region of origin (OR 2.2, 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.4), whereas topic concerning community/risk factors decreased the likelihood of publication (OR 0.3, 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.74). Positive results, multicenter collaboration and industry sponsorship did not affect publication rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 of every 3 abstracts presented at an international stroke meeting was not published as a full manuscript within 5 years. Poster abstracts were less likely to be published in full manuscript form than oral presentations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16931779     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000240509.05587.a2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  14 in total

1.  Are results from pharmaceutical-company-sponsored studies available to the public?

Authors:  Rafael Dal-Ré; Alejandro Pedromingo; Manuel García-Losa; Juan Lahuerta; Rafael Ortega
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Archiving "event knowledge": bringing "dark data" to light.

Authors:  Joshua Illig
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2008-07

3.  Publication rates of abstracts presented at the Association of Chiropractic Colleges Educational Conference/Research Agenda Conference from 2002 to 2008.

Authors:  Barclay W Bakkum; Cynthia Chapman; Claire Johnson
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2013-12-02

4.  Writing abstracts and developing posters for national meetings.

Authors:  Gordon J Wood; R Sean Morrison
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Publication bias in diagnostic imaging: conference abstracts with positive conclusions are more likely to be published.

Authors:  Lee Treanor; Robert A Frank; Lindsay A Cherpak; Ana Dehmoobad Sharifabadi; Jean-Paul Salameh; Zachary Hallgrimson; Nicholas Fabiano; Trevor A McGrath; Noemie Kraaijpoel; Jason Yao; Daniel A Korevaar; Patrick M Bossuyt; Matthew D F McInnes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roberta W Scherer; Cesar Ugarte-Gil; Christine Schmucker; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: a meta-analysis of empirical studies.

Authors:  Fujian Song; Sheetal Parekh-Bhurke; Lee Hooper; Yoon K Loke; Jon J Ryder; Alex J Sutton; Caroline B Hing; Ian Harvey
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Factors that Affect Integrity of Authorship of Scientific Meeting Abstracts.

Authors:  John Lynch; Jane E Strasser; Christopher J Lindsell; Joel Tsevat
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2013

Review 9.  Industry sponsorship and research outcome.

Authors:  Andreas Lundh; Joel Lexchin; Barbara Mintzes; Jeppe B Schroll; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-16

10.  Frequency and factors influencing publication of abstracts presented at three major nephrology meetings.

Authors:  Ziv Harel; Ron Wald; Ari Juda; Chaim M Bell
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2011-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.