Literature DB >> 16931656

Large-dose propofol during cardiopulmonary bypass decreases biochemical markers of myocardial injury in coronary surgery patients: a comparison with isoflurane.

Zhengyuan Xia1, Zhiyong Huang, David M Ansley.   

Abstract

We investigated if increasing propofol's dosage to augment its antioxidant capacity during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) could confer cardiac protection. Fifty-four coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients were randomly assigned to small-dose propofol (Group P; n = 18), large-dose propofol (Group HiP; n = 18), or isoflurane Group (Group I; n = 18). After the induction, anesthesia was maintained with an inspired concentration of isoflurane 1%-3.5% (Group I) or a continuous infusion of propofol 60 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (Group P) throughout the surgery. In Group HiP, this dose of propofol was increased to 120 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 10 min before the onset of CPB until 15 min after aortic unclamping and then decreased to 60 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) until the end of surgery. The duration of aortic cross-clamping was 83 +/- 24, 88 +/- 22, and 81 +/- 20 min in Group P, Group HiP, and Group I, respectively (P > 0.1). Plasma malondialdehyde, a marker of oxidative stress, was significantly lower at 8 h after CPB, and Troponin I was lower at 24 h after CPB in Group HiP compared with Group P and Group I (P < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in inotropic requirements for separation from CPB in Group HiP compared with Group I. Postoperative systemic vascular resistance was significantly reduced in Group HiP as compared with Group I. Mean cardiac index was significantly higher at 24 h after CPB in Group HiP compared with Group P and Group I (P < 0.05) (Group I, 2.2 +/- 0.1; Group P, 2.3 +/- 0.2; and Group HiP, 2.8 +/- 0.3 L x min(-1) x m(-2), respectively). The duration of intensive care unit stay was significantly shorter in Group Hi-P compared with Group I. We conclude that administration of a large dose of propofol during CPB attenuates postoperative myocardial cellular damage as compared with isoflurane or small-dose propofol anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16931656     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000230612.29452.a6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  30 in total

1.  Protective effect of propofol and its relation to postoperation recovery in children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Wen-fang Xia; Yu Liu; Qing-shan Zhou; Qi-zhu Tang; Han-dong Zou
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 2.  Inflammatory response and cardioprotection during open-heart surgery: the importance of anaesthetics.

Authors:  M-S Suleiman; K Zacharowski; G D Angelini
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Protective effect of propofol preconditioning on ischemia-reperfusion injury in human hepatocyte.

Authors:  Yuzhu Zhang; Zhenzhen Chen; Nianhai Feng; Junxia Tang; Xingbo Zhao; Chengxiao Liu; Hongyu Xu; Mengyuan Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Anaesthetics as cardioprotectants: translatability and mechanism.

Authors:  C Kikuchi; S Dosenovic; M Bienengraeber
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Sevoflurane-Remifentanil Versus Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia During Noncardiac Surgery for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease - A Prospective Study Between 2016 and 2017 at a Single Center.

Authors:  Zhongliang Dai; Miao Lin; Yali Li; Wenli Gao; Ping Wang; Juan Lin; Zhenzhen Wan; Yuanxu Jiang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-08-21

6.  Comparison of the effects of desflurane and propofol anesthesia on the inflammatory response and s100β protein during coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Elif Doğan Baki; Mustafa Aldemir; Serdar Kokulu; Halit Buğra Koca; Yüksel Ela; Remziye Gül Sıvacı; Nilgün Kavrut Öztürk; Mustafa Emmiler; Fahri Adalı; Hanife Uzel
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.092

7.  Cardioprotective effects of anesthetic preconditioning in rats with ischemia-reperfusion injury: propofol versus isoflurane.

Authors:  Xing Tao; Ling-qiao Lu; Qing Xu; Shu-ren Li; Mao-tsun Lin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.066

8.  Postconditioning of sevoflurane and propofol is associated with mitochondrial permeability transition pore.

Authors:  Wei He; Feng-jiang Zhang; Shao-ping Wang; Gang Chen; Cong-cong Chen; Min Yan
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.066

9.  Perioperative cardioprotection.

Authors:  May Km Leung; Michael G Irwin
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2013-03-04

10.  Propofol Attenuates Small Intestinal Ischemia Reperfusion Injury through Inhibiting NADPH Oxidase Mediated Mast Cell Activation.

Authors:  Xiaoliang Gan; Dandan Xing; Guangjie Su; Shun Li; Chenfang Luo; Michael G Irwin; Zhengyuan Xia; Haobo Li; Ziqing Hei
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 6.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.