Literature DB >> 16931538

A Bayesian compound stochastic process for modeling nonstationary and nonhomogeneous sequence evolution.

Samuel Blanquart1, Nicolas Lartillot.   

Abstract

Variations of nucleotidic composition affect phylogenetic inference conducted under stationary models of evolution. In particular, they may cause unrelated taxa sharing similar base composition to be grouped together in the resulting phylogeny. To address this problem, we developed a nonstationary and nonhomogeneous model accounting for compositional biases. Unlike previous nonstationary models, which are branchwise, that is, assume that base composition only changes at the nodes of the tree, in our model, the process of compositional drift is totally uncoupled from the speciation events. In addition, the total number of events of compositional drift distributed across the tree is directly inferred from the data. We implemented the method in a Bayesian framework, relying on Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithms, and applied it to several nucleotidic data sets. In most cases, the stationarity assumption was rejected in favor of our nonstationary model. In addition, we show that our method is able to resolve a well-known artifact. By Bayes factor evaluation, we compared our model with 2 previously developed nonstationary models. We show that the coupling between speciations and compositional shifts inherent to branchwise models may lead to an overparameterization, resulting in a lesser fit. In some cases, this leads to incorrect conclusions, concerning the nature of the compositional biases. In contrast, our compound model more flexibly adapts its effective number of parameters to the data sets under investigation. Altogether, our results show that accounting for nonstationary sequence evolution may require more elaborate and more flexible models than those currently used.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16931538     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msl091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  42 in total

1.  A total-evidence approach to dating with fossils, applied to the early radiation of the hymenoptera.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; Seraina Klopfstein; Lars Vilhelmsen; Susanne Schulmeister; Debra L Murray; Alexandr P Rasnitsyn
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 2.  Probabilistic models of eukaryotic evolution: time for integration.

Authors:  Nicolas Lartillot
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A mixed branch length model of heterotachy improves phylogenetic accuracy.

Authors:  Bryan Kolaczkowski; Joseph W Thornton
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Basing population genetic inferences and models of molecular evolution upon desired stationary distributions of DNA or protein sequences.

Authors:  Sang Chul Choi; Benjamin D Redelings; Jeffrey L Thorne
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Models of coding sequence evolution.

Authors:  Wayne Delport; Konrad Scheffler; Cathal Seoighe
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  Bayesian comparisons of codon substitution models.

Authors:  Nicolas Rodrigue; Nicolas Lartillot; Hervé Philippe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Phylogenomic analyses of lophophorates (brachiopods, phoronids and bryozoans) confirm the Lophotrochozoa concept.

Authors:  Martin Helmkampf; Iris Bruchhaus; Bernhard Hausdorf
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  INDELible: a flexible simulator of biological sequence evolution.

Authors:  William Fletcher; Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  On the phylogenetic position of Myzostomida: can 77 genes get it wrong?

Authors:  Christoph Bleidorn; Lars Podsiadlowski; Min Zhong; Igor Eeckhaut; Stefanie Hartmann; Kenneth M Halanych; Ralph Tiedemann
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Can comprehensive background knowledge be incorporated into substitution models to improve phylogenetic analyses? A case study on major arthropod relationships.

Authors:  Björn M von Reumont; Karen Meusemann; Nikolaus U Szucsich; Emiliano Dell'Ampio; Vivek Gowri-Shankar; Daniela Bartel; Sabrina Simon; Harald O Letsch; Roman R Stocsits; Yun-xia Luan; Johann Wolfgang Wägele; Günther Pass; Heike Hadrys; Bernhard Misof
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.