Literature DB >> 16931359

Addition of right lateral decubitus positioning improves vertebral visualization with VFA in selected patients.

Nellie Vallarta-Ast1, Diane Krueger, Neil Binkley.   

Abstract

Densitometric vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) allows detection of clinically unappreciated vertebral fracture. However, vertebral visualization using VFA can be suboptimal. In such individuals, alternative spine positioning may enhance visualization. Consistent with this, we observed that reversal of positioning (right lateral decubitus rather than standard left lateral decubitus, subsequently referred to as "reverse" positioning) improved visualization in patients with suboptimal vertebral visualization. This report describes 33 such individuals (i.e., 30 men and 3 women); their mean age and their lowest T-score (L1-L4 spine, proximal femur or 0.3 radius) was 69.9 yr and 2.2, respectively. All images were acquired using a GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy densitometer (GE Healthcare, Madison, WI). Reverse VFA increased the number of visualized vertebrae in 82% of these patients (27 of 33; p<0.0001). Specifically, only 62% of vertebrae from T4-L5 were visualized using the standard left lateral position. Addition of either full or partial reverse VFA increased (p<0.0001) the number of visualized vertebrae to 83% (384 of 462). In this cohort, reverse positioning allowed detection of 4 additional vertebral fractures, including two in patients without previously identified fractures. We conclude that in selected patients with suboptimal vertebral visualization on VFA, addition of reverse positioning improves visualization and may enhance vertebral fracture detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16931359     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  3 in total

1.  Are bilateral decubitus views necessary in assessing for vertebral compression fractures using DXA vertebral fracture assessment?

Authors:  Y-C Lin; T-S Huang; J S Wu; Y-C Cheung; Y-H Huang; C-M Sung; Y-H Juan; F-P Chen; J M Ni Mhuircheartaigh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Evaluation of vertebral fracture assessment by dual X-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter setting.

Authors:  T Fuerst; C Wu; H K Genant; G von Ingersleben; Y Chen; C Johnston; M J Econs; N Binkley; T J Vokes; G Crans; B H Mitlak
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  An evaluation of densitometric vertebral fracture assessment in men.

Authors:  N Vallarta-Ast; D Krueger; C Wrase; S Agrawal; N Binkley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 4.507

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.