Literature DB >> 16931347

Vertebral morphometry by DXA: a comparison of supine lateral and decubitus lateral densitometers.

Derek Pearson1, Barbara Horton, Desmond J Green, David J Hosking, Ann Goodby, Susan A Steel.   

Abstract

Identification of vertebral fracture has become increasingly important in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. This study compares the morphometric techniques on a fan beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) GE-Lunar Expert system (Expert) using a supine lateral position and a narrow fan beam GE-Lunar Prodigy system (Prodigy; GE Lunar, Madison, WI) that requires lateral decubitus positioning. Patient acceptability, image quality, observer, and equipment variability were determined. Study subjects were recruited from clinical referrals sent for a routine DXA study that included vertebral morphometry. Twenty-five patients underwent lateral vertebral assessment on both machines and completed a questionnaire on comfort and tolerability. Analysis was undertaken by two trained observers. Vertebral height, anterior/posterior height (A/P) and mid/posterior height (M/P) ratios, image quality, and prevalent fractures were assessed. There were no significant differences in patient comfort or image quality scores. More upper thoracic vertebrae could be assessed on the Expert, and good radiographic positioning was easier to achieve on the Expert. Inter-observer coefficients of variance percentage (CV%) of vertebral height was lower on the Prodigy (3.5% in the lumbar spine rising to 12.8% in the thoracic spine) than the Expert (4.2% to 16.9%). Inter-observer CV% for A/P and M/P ratios varied from 2.5% to 10.5% on the Prodigy compared with 3.5% to 12.3% on the Expert, depending on vertebral level. The variation between instruments was similar to the inter-observer CV% (anterior height: -0.11+/-1.65 mm; mid height: 0.54+/-1.51 mm; posterior height: 0.43+/-1.46 mm). There was good agreement between observers and between the Expert and Prodigy in identifying severe fractures, but lack of agreement in identifying moderate fractures. In conclusion, there was no clinically significant difference in patient comfort and image quality between the Expert and the Prodigy. The inter-observer variations in vertebral height and A/P and M/P ratios are similar to the variations between instruments. In making the change from the supine lateral to the decubitus lateral positioning, measurements of vertebral height are reproducible and patient comfort is not compromised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16931347     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  5 in total

1.  Are bilateral decubitus views necessary in assessing for vertebral compression fractures using DXA vertebral fracture assessment?

Authors:  Y-C Lin; T-S Huang; J S Wu; Y-C Cheung; Y-H Huang; C-M Sung; Y-H Juan; F-P Chen; J M Ni Mhuircheartaigh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Inter-observer agreement of vertebral fracture assessment with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry equipment.

Authors:  Jacob M Mostert; Stephan R Romeijn; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Daphne D D Rietbergen; Lenka M Pereira Arias-Bouda; Christoph Götz; Matthew D DiFranco; Hans Peter Dimai; Willem Grootjans
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Observer agreement in pediatric semiquantitative vertebral fracture diagnosis.

Authors:  Kerry Siminoski; Brian Lentle; Mary Ann Matzinger; Nazih Shenouda; Leanne M Ward
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-12-10

4.  Local topological analysis of densitometer-generated scan images of the proximal femur for differentiation between patients with hip fracture and age-matched controls.

Authors:  H F Boehm; J Lutz; A Horng; M Notohamiprodjo; A Panteleon; K-J Pfeifer; M Reiser
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  High prevalence of vertebral fractures in seizure patients with normal bone density receiving chronic anti-epileptic drugs.

Authors:  P M Dussault; D McCarthy; S A Davis; M Thakore-James; A A Lazzari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.507

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.