Literature DB >> 16931220

A randomized, multicenter, open-label trial to determine peritonitis rate, product defect, and technique survival between ANDY-Disc and UltraBag in patients on CAPD.

Hin-Seng Wong1, Loke-Meng Ong, Teck-Onn Lim, Lai-Seong Hooi, Zaki Morad, Rozina Ghazalli, Wan Shaariah, Yam-Ngo Lim, Ghazali Ahmad, Bak-Leong Goh, Lynster Liaw, Susan Pee, Ming-Lee Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the various twin-bag systems available on the market, we decided to conduct a therapeutic equivalence study comparing ANDY-Disc (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany) with UltraBag (Baxter, Deerfield, IL) in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) therapy.
METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized trial is designed to show the therapeutic equivalence of ANDY-Disc with UltraBag. All CAPD patients from the 6 participating centers who met inclusion/exclusion criteria were enrolled into the trial. They were randomly assigned and converted from the Y-disconnect system (Ultraset; Baxter) to the twin-bag systems. The primary outcome variable is peritonitis, and secondary outcome parameters are technique failure or product defect.
RESULTS: From April 2002 to May 2003, a total of 270 patients were recruited for this study. Overall peritonitis rates were 22.9 patient-months/episode for ANDY-Disc and 35.0 patient-months/episode for UltraBag. The overall peritonitis rate for ANDY-Disc was 53% greater compared with UltraBag, but the 95% confidence interval overlaps the prespecified margin of equivalence. There were more product defects reported with ANDY-Disc; 236 product defects compared with 17 with UltraBag. The time series of the number of product defects and peritonitis count on the ANDY-Disc arm suggests a possible cause-and-effect relationship.
CONCLUSION: Therapeutic equivalence of ANDY-Disc to UltraBag could not be established with respect to peritonitis. There is a trend toward greater risk for peritonitis on the Andy-Disc arm. There also is a suggestive cause-and-effect relation between the occurrence of product defect and peritonitis on the ANDY-Disc arm during the early part of the trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16931220     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  5 in total

Review 1.  Consensus guidelines for the prevention and treatment of catheter-related infections and peritonitis in pediatric patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: 2012 update.

Authors:  Bradley A Warady; Sevcan Bakkaloglu; Jason Newland; Michelle Cantwell; Enrico Verrina; Alicia Neu; Vimal Chadha; Hui-Kim Yap; Franz Schaefer
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  An Initial Experience of Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis in Children in the Armed Forces.

Authors:  M Kanitkar; H R Ramamurthy
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 3.  Double bag or Y-set versus standard transfer systems for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Conal Daly; June D Cody; Izhar Khan; Kannaiyan S Rabindranath; Luke Vale; Sheila A Wallace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-08-13

4.  Mycobacterium porcinum peritonitis in a patient on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Ritesh Patil; Trupti Patil; Louis Schenfeld; Samuel Massoud
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Protocol for a randomised, open-label, parallel group, multicentre controlled study to evaluate the clinical performance and safety of Stay Safe Link compared with Stay Safe in patients with end-stage kidney disease on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Wen Yao Mak; Loke Meng Ong; Bak Leong Goh; Sunita Bavanandan; Lily Mushahar; Chin Tho Leong; Lai Seong Hooi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.